Counterfactuals in “agreeing to disagree” type results
Moses and Nachum (1990) identified conceptual flaws (later echoed by Samet, 2010) in Bacharach's (1985) generalization of Aumann's (1976) seminal “agreeing to disagree” result by demonstrating that the crucial assumptions of like-mindedness and the Sure-Thing Principle are not meaningfully...
Autor principal: | Tarbush, B |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Agreed and disagreed uncertainty
por: Gambetti, L, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The double crux : disagreeing to agree
por: You, Sze Yee
Publicado: (2019) -
A discourse study of agreeing and disagreeing amongst Malaysian English Speakers /
por: 203017 Kwon, Angela Mei Jun
Publicado: (2006) -
In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions.
por: Wilkinson, D, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Hard to Disagree, Mostly
por: Whittington, R, et al.
Publicado: (2008)