Systematic evaluation of the patient-reported outcome (PRO) content of clinical trial protocols
BACKGROUND: Qualitative evidence suggests patient-reported outcome (PRO) information is frequently absent from clinical trial protocols, potentially leading to inconsistent PRO data collection and risking bias. Direct evidence regarding PRO trial protocol content is lacking. The aim of this study wa...
Main Authors: | Kyte, D, Duffy, H, Fletcher, B, Gheorghe, A, Mercieca-Bebber, R, King, M, Draper, H, Ives, J, Brundage, M, Blazeby, J, Calvert, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Similar Items
-
Guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trial protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension
by: Calvert, M, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension.
by: Calvert, M, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Inconsistencies in quality of life data collection in clinical trials: a potential source of bias? Interviews with research nurses and trialists.
by: Derek Kyte, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Centre selection for clinical trials and the generalisability of results: a mixed methods study
by: Gheorghe, A, et al.
Published: (2013) -
HOW ARE CENTRES INCLUDED IN RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS WITH PARALLEL ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS IN THE UK?
by: Gheorghe, A, et al.
Published: (2013)