Towards a new politics of migration
This paper reconsiders Stephen Castle’s classic paper Why Migration Policies Fail. Beginning with the so-called ‘migration crisis’ of 2015 it considers the role of numbers is assessing success or failure. It argues that in the UK public debates about immigration changed with EU Enlargement in 2004,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Taylor and Francis
2017
|
| _version_ | 1797084810282270720 |
|---|---|
| author | Anderson, B |
| author_facet | Anderson, B |
| author_sort | Anderson, B |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This paper reconsiders Stephen Castle’s classic paper Why Migration Policies Fail. Beginning with the so-called ‘migration crisis’ of 2015 it considers the role of numbers is assessing success or failure. It argues that in the UK public debates about immigration changed with EU Enlargement in 2004, when the emphasis shifted from concerns about asylum to concerns about EU mobility. Concerns were exacerbated by the government’s failure to meet its promise to reduce net migration. This policy is hampered by the general problem of definition of ‘migrant’ and the gap between statistical measures and popular usage in which ‘migration’ signifies problematic mobility. In fact, concern about migration has become a placeholder for concerns about globalisation and democratic accountability. A new politics of migration must make connections between migrants and citizens, but also between migration and other global processes, particularly outsourcing and the exploitation of labour and resources in the global south. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:00:17Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:9d21db8c-d3c0-45b9-bf0e-6708dbd0e530 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:00:17Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:9d21db8c-d3c0-45b9-bf0e-6708dbd0e5302022-03-27T00:40:45ZTowards a new politics of migrationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9d21db8c-d3c0-45b9-bf0e-6708dbd0e530Symplectic Elements at OxfordTaylor and Francis2017Anderson, BThis paper reconsiders Stephen Castle’s classic paper Why Migration Policies Fail. Beginning with the so-called ‘migration crisis’ of 2015 it considers the role of numbers is assessing success or failure. It argues that in the UK public debates about immigration changed with EU Enlargement in 2004, when the emphasis shifted from concerns about asylum to concerns about EU mobility. Concerns were exacerbated by the government’s failure to meet its promise to reduce net migration. This policy is hampered by the general problem of definition of ‘migrant’ and the gap between statistical measures and popular usage in which ‘migration’ signifies problematic mobility. In fact, concern about migration has become a placeholder for concerns about globalisation and democratic accountability. A new politics of migration must make connections between migrants and citizens, but also between migration and other global processes, particularly outsourcing and the exploitation of labour and resources in the global south. |
| spellingShingle | Anderson, B Towards a new politics of migration |
| title | Towards a new politics of migration |
| title_full | Towards a new politics of migration |
| title_fullStr | Towards a new politics of migration |
| title_full_unstemmed | Towards a new politics of migration |
| title_short | Towards a new politics of migration |
| title_sort | towards a new politics of migration |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonb towardsanewpoliticsofmigration |