Review of clinical outcomes-based anchors of minimum clinically important differences in hip and knee registry-based reports and publications.
Patient-reported outcome measures are tools that allow clinicians and researchers to gauge patients' level of satisfaction and quality of life after a medical intervention. The use of patient-reported outcome measures and the clinically relevant score differentials over time as they relate to o...
Main Authors: | Romero, L, Nieuwenhuijse, M, Carr, A, Sedrakyan, A |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Similar Items
-
Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe
by: Lübbeke, A, et al.
Published: (2018) -
The role of national registries in improving patient safety for hip and knee replacements
by: Lübbeke, A, et al.
Published: (2017) -
The role of national registries in improving patient safety for hip and knee replacements
by: Anne Lübbeke, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01) -
Complications to 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty: observations from an Australian clinical outcomes registry
by: Sung Mu Heo, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective
by: Bryan D. Springer, MD, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)