Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.

AIM: The study was a prospective randomised controlled double-masked trial performed in two centres to compare sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation (MPDL) with conventional green laser photocoagulation (CGL) in the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular oedema (CSMO)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Figueira, J, Khan, J, Nunes, S, Sivaprasad, S, Rosa, A, de Abreu, J, Cunha-Vaz, J, Chong, N
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2009
_version_ 1797084934250168320
author Figueira, J
Khan, J
Nunes, S
Sivaprasad, S
Rosa, A
de Abreu, J
Cunha-Vaz, J
Chong, N
author_facet Figueira, J
Khan, J
Nunes, S
Sivaprasad, S
Rosa, A
de Abreu, J
Cunha-Vaz, J
Chong, N
author_sort Figueira, J
collection OXFORD
description AIM: The study was a prospective randomised controlled double-masked trial performed in two centres to compare sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation (MPDL) with conventional green laser photocoagulation (CGL) in the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular oedema (CSMO). METHODS: Fifty-three patients (84 eyes) with diabetic CSMO were randomly assigned to MPDL (n = 44) or CGL (n = 40) according to the modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Treatments were performed after baseline and re-treatments were allowed at or after the 4 month visit if necessary. Parameters noted included the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), colour fundus photographs, central retinal thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT), vision contrast sensitivity with Pelli-Robson charts and presence of visible laser scars at baseline and at 4 and 12 months. The primary outcome was BCVA at 12 months. RESULTS: All patients completed 12 months of follow-up after treatment at baseline. There were no statistically significant differences in BCVA, contrast sensitivity and retinal thickness between the two laser modalities at 0, 4 and 12 months. We found that laser scarring was much more apparent with CGL than with the sub-threshold approach (MPDL). Laser scars were identified at the 12 month visits in 13.9% of the MPDL-treated eyes compared with 59.0% of the CGL-treated eyes (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation is equally as effective as CGL treatment for CSMO. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISTRN 90646644.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:02:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9db76216-f3e5-45e9-866d-a11ac421b6d4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:02:05Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9db76216-f3e5-45e9-866d-a11ac421b6d42022-03-27T00:45:03ZProspective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9db76216-f3e5-45e9-866d-a11ac421b6d4EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Figueira, JKhan, JNunes, SSivaprasad, SRosa, Ade Abreu, JCunha-Vaz, JChong, N AIM: The study was a prospective randomised controlled double-masked trial performed in two centres to compare sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation (MPDL) with conventional green laser photocoagulation (CGL) in the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular oedema (CSMO). METHODS: Fifty-three patients (84 eyes) with diabetic CSMO were randomly assigned to MPDL (n = 44) or CGL (n = 40) according to the modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Treatments were performed after baseline and re-treatments were allowed at or after the 4 month visit if necessary. Parameters noted included the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), colour fundus photographs, central retinal thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT), vision contrast sensitivity with Pelli-Robson charts and presence of visible laser scars at baseline and at 4 and 12 months. The primary outcome was BCVA at 12 months. RESULTS: All patients completed 12 months of follow-up after treatment at baseline. There were no statistically significant differences in BCVA, contrast sensitivity and retinal thickness between the two laser modalities at 0, 4 and 12 months. We found that laser scarring was much more apparent with CGL than with the sub-threshold approach (MPDL). Laser scars were identified at the 12 month visits in 13.9% of the MPDL-treated eyes compared with 59.0% of the CGL-treated eyes (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation is equally as effective as CGL treatment for CSMO. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISTRN 90646644.
spellingShingle Figueira, J
Khan, J
Nunes, S
Sivaprasad, S
Rosa, A
de Abreu, J
Cunha-Vaz, J
Chong, N
Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.
title Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.
title_full Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.
title_fullStr Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.
title_short Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.
title_sort prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema
work_keys_str_mv AT figueiraj prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingsubthresholdmicropulsediodelaserphotocoagulationandconventionalgreenlaserforclinicallysignificantdiabeticmacularoedema
AT khanj prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingsubthresholdmicropulsediodelaserphotocoagulationandconventionalgreenlaserforclinicallysignificantdiabeticmacularoedema
AT nuness prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingsubthresholdmicropulsediodelaserphotocoagulationandconventionalgreenlaserforclinicallysignificantdiabeticmacularoedema
AT sivaprasads prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingsubthresholdmicropulsediodelaserphotocoagulationandconventionalgreenlaserforclinicallysignificantdiabeticmacularoedema
AT rosaa prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingsubthresholdmicropulsediodelaserphotocoagulationandconventionalgreenlaserforclinicallysignificantdiabeticmacularoedema
AT deabreuj prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingsubthresholdmicropulsediodelaserphotocoagulationandconventionalgreenlaserforclinicallysignificantdiabeticmacularoedema
AT cunhavazj prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingsubthresholdmicropulsediodelaserphotocoagulationandconventionalgreenlaserforclinicallysignificantdiabeticmacularoedema
AT chongn prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingsubthresholdmicropulsediodelaserphotocoagulationandconventionalgreenlaserforclinicallysignificantdiabeticmacularoedema