Association and haplotype analysis of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) gene, a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility.

The gene for insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) represents a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility. IDE maps to chromosome 10q23.3, a region linked to diabetes in several populations; the rat homolog has been directly implicated in diabetes susceptibility; and kno...

תיאור מלא

מידע ביבליוגרפי
Main Authors: Groves, C, Wiltshire, S, Smedley, D, Owen, K, Frayling, T, Walker, M, Hitman, G, Levy, J, O'Rahilly, S, Menzel, S, Hattersley, A, McCarthy, M
פורמט: Journal article
שפה:English
יצא לאור: 2003
_version_ 1826287782224461824
author Groves, C
Wiltshire, S
Smedley, D
Owen, K
Frayling, T
Walker, M
Hitman, G
Levy, J
O'Rahilly, S
Menzel, S
Hattersley, A
McCarthy, M
author_facet Groves, C
Wiltshire, S
Smedley, D
Owen, K
Frayling, T
Walker, M
Hitman, G
Levy, J
O'Rahilly, S
Menzel, S
Hattersley, A
McCarthy, M
author_sort Groves, C
collection OXFORD
description The gene for insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) represents a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility. IDE maps to chromosome 10q23.3, a region linked to diabetes in several populations; the rat homolog has been directly implicated in diabetes susceptibility; and known functions of IDE support an important role in glucose homeostasis. We sought evidence for association between IDE variation and diabetes by mutation screening, defining local haplotype structure, and genotyping variants delineating common haplotypic diversity. An initial case-control analysis (628 diabetic probands from multiplex sibships and 604 control subjects) found no haplotypic associations, although one variant (IDE2, -179T-->C) showed modest association with diabetes (odds ratio [OR]1.25, P = 0.03). Linkage partitioning analyses failed to support this association, but provided borderline evidence for a different variant (IDE10, IVS20-405A-->G) (P = 0.06). Neither variant was associated with diabetes when replication was sought in 377 early onset diabetic subjects and 825 control subjects, though combined analysis of all typed cohorts indicated a nominally significant effect at IDE2 (OR 1.21 [1.04-1.40], P = 0.013). In the absence of convincing support for this association from linkage partitioning or analyses of continuous measures of glycemia, we conclude that analysis of over 2,400 samples provides no compelling evidence that variation in IDE contributes to diabetes susceptibility in humans.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:03:48Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9e46ed9f-5f35-4d5f-8fa8-94efd1ef917a
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:03:48Z
publishDate 2003
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9e46ed9f-5f35-4d5f-8fa8-94efd1ef917a2022-03-27T00:49:01ZAssociation and haplotype analysis of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) gene, a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9e46ed9f-5f35-4d5f-8fa8-94efd1ef917aEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2003Groves, CWiltshire, SSmedley, DOwen, KFrayling, TWalker, MHitman, GLevy, JO'Rahilly, SMenzel, SHattersley, AMcCarthy, MThe gene for insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) represents a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility. IDE maps to chromosome 10q23.3, a region linked to diabetes in several populations; the rat homolog has been directly implicated in diabetes susceptibility; and known functions of IDE support an important role in glucose homeostasis. We sought evidence for association between IDE variation and diabetes by mutation screening, defining local haplotype structure, and genotyping variants delineating common haplotypic diversity. An initial case-control analysis (628 diabetic probands from multiplex sibships and 604 control subjects) found no haplotypic associations, although one variant (IDE2, -179T-->C) showed modest association with diabetes (odds ratio [OR]1.25, P = 0.03). Linkage partitioning analyses failed to support this association, but provided borderline evidence for a different variant (IDE10, IVS20-405A-->G) (P = 0.06). Neither variant was associated with diabetes when replication was sought in 377 early onset diabetic subjects and 825 control subjects, though combined analysis of all typed cohorts indicated a nominally significant effect at IDE2 (OR 1.21 [1.04-1.40], P = 0.013). In the absence of convincing support for this association from linkage partitioning or analyses of continuous measures of glycemia, we conclude that analysis of over 2,400 samples provides no compelling evidence that variation in IDE contributes to diabetes susceptibility in humans.
spellingShingle Groves, C
Wiltshire, S
Smedley, D
Owen, K
Frayling, T
Walker, M
Hitman, G
Levy, J
O'Rahilly, S
Menzel, S
Hattersley, A
McCarthy, M
Association and haplotype analysis of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) gene, a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility.
title Association and haplotype analysis of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) gene, a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility.
title_full Association and haplotype analysis of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) gene, a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility.
title_fullStr Association and haplotype analysis of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) gene, a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility.
title_full_unstemmed Association and haplotype analysis of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) gene, a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility.
title_short Association and haplotype analysis of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) gene, a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility.
title_sort association and haplotype analysis of the insulin degrading enzyme ide gene a strong positional and biological candidate for type 2 diabetes susceptibility
work_keys_str_mv AT grovesc associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT wiltshires associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT smedleyd associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT owenk associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT fraylingt associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT walkerm associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT hitmang associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT levyj associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT orahillys associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT menzels associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT hattersleya associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility
AT mccarthym associationandhaplotypeanalysisoftheinsulindegradingenzymeidegeneastrongpositionalandbiologicalcandidatefortype2diabetessusceptibility