The City and Corporate Performance: Condemned or Exonerated?

This paper summarizes the conventional wisdom concerning differences between financial systems. It argues that many of them do not stand up to close scrutiny. Instead, it suggests that the main differences concern the concentration and nature of ownership. Systems with high concentrations of ownersh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mayer, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 1997
_version_ 1826287937636007936
author Mayer, C
author_facet Mayer, C
author_sort Mayer, C
collection OXFORD
description This paper summarizes the conventional wisdom concerning differences between financial systems. It argues that many of them do not stand up to close scrutiny. Instead, it suggests that the main differences concern the concentration and nature of ownership. Systems with high concentrations of ownership (frequently in the hands of families and other companies) may encourage more direct monitoring and control, greater stability in decision-taking, and greater commitment to other stakeholders than systems with more dispersed ownership. On the other hand, they are more subject to the private benefits of control and less flexible in responding to external factors. Different systems may, therefore, be suited to different types of corporate activity. Instead of seeking to impose uniform forms of corporate governance, the paper concludes that regulation should be permissive in allowing companies to choose their preferred forms of ownership and control.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:06:10Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9f12b658-487f-481a-817e-b16a08618235
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:06:10Z
publishDate 1997
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9f12b658-487f-481a-817e-b16a086182352022-03-27T00:54:39ZThe City and Corporate Performance: Condemned or Exonerated?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9f12b658-487f-481a-817e-b16a08618235EnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrints1997Mayer, CThis paper summarizes the conventional wisdom concerning differences between financial systems. It argues that many of them do not stand up to close scrutiny. Instead, it suggests that the main differences concern the concentration and nature of ownership. Systems with high concentrations of ownership (frequently in the hands of families and other companies) may encourage more direct monitoring and control, greater stability in decision-taking, and greater commitment to other stakeholders than systems with more dispersed ownership. On the other hand, they are more subject to the private benefits of control and less flexible in responding to external factors. Different systems may, therefore, be suited to different types of corporate activity. Instead of seeking to impose uniform forms of corporate governance, the paper concludes that regulation should be permissive in allowing companies to choose their preferred forms of ownership and control.
spellingShingle Mayer, C
The City and Corporate Performance: Condemned or Exonerated?
title The City and Corporate Performance: Condemned or Exonerated?
title_full The City and Corporate Performance: Condemned or Exonerated?
title_fullStr The City and Corporate Performance: Condemned or Exonerated?
title_full_unstemmed The City and Corporate Performance: Condemned or Exonerated?
title_short The City and Corporate Performance: Condemned or Exonerated?
title_sort city and corporate performance condemned or exonerated
work_keys_str_mv AT mayerc thecityandcorporateperformancecondemnedorexonerated
AT mayerc cityandcorporateperformancecondemnedorexonerated