Reply to Davis-Stober et al.: Violations of rationality in a psychophysical task are not aggregation artifacts.
Humans deviate from rational choice theory if their estimates of the attribute values for one alternative change as a function of the attribute values of competing alternatives (1). In our paper (2), we report such “context-dependent” (CD) deviations from rationality in the form of a frequent winner...
Main Authors: | Tsetsos, K, Moran, R, Moreland, J, Chater, N, Usher, M, Summerfield, C |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
National Academy of Sciences
2016
|
Similar Items
-
Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making
by: Tsetsos, K, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Ion doping behavior of stöber silica-nanosynthesis and application
by: Song, Xiaohui
Published: (2016) -
Response to Davis and Plaisted-Grant: Psychophysical data do not support the low-noise account of autism.
by: Manning, C, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Preference reversal in multiattribute choice.
by: Tsetsos, K, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal.
by: Tsetsos, K, et al.
Published: (2012)