Reply to Davis-Stober et al.: Violations of rationality in a psychophysical task are not aggregation artifacts.
Humans deviate from rational choice theory if their estimates of the attribute values for one alternative change as a function of the attribute values of competing alternatives (1). In our paper (2), we report such “context-dependent” (CD) deviations from rationality in the form of a frequent winner...
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | Tsetsos, K, Moran, R, Moreland, J, Chater, N, Usher, M, Summerfield, C |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Journal article |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
National Academy of Sciences
2016
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making
حسب: Tsetsos, K, وآخرون
منشور في: (2016) -
Ion doping behavior of stöber silica-nanosynthesis and application
حسب: Song, Xiaohui
منشور في: (2016) -
Response to Davis and Plaisted-Grant: Psychophysical data do not support the low-noise account of autism.
حسب: Manning, C, وآخرون
منشور في: (2014) -
Preference reversal in multiattribute choice.
حسب: Tsetsos, K, وآخرون
منشور في: (2010) -
Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal.
حسب: Tsetsos, K, وآخرون
منشور في: (2012)