Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re-examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate

Jurgen Habermas has argued that carrying out pre-natal germline enhancements would be inimical to the future child's autonomy. In this article, I suggest that many of the objections that have been made against Habermas' arguments by liberals in the enhancement debate misconstrue his claims...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pugh, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2015
Subjects:
_version_ 1826287993948733440
author Pugh, J
author_facet Pugh, J
author_sort Pugh, J
collection OXFORD
description Jurgen Habermas has argued that carrying out pre-natal germline enhancements would be inimical to the future child's autonomy. In this article, I suggest that many of the objections that have been made against Habermas' arguments by liberals in the enhancement debate misconstrue his claims. To explain why, I begin by explaining how Habermas' view of personal autonomy confers particular importance to the agent's embodiment and social environment. In view of this, I explain that it is possible to draw two arguments against germline enhancements from Habermas' thought. I call these arguments ‘the argument from negative freedom’ and ‘the argument from natality’. Although I argue that many of the common liberal objections to Habermas are not applicable when his arguments are properly understood, I go on to suggest ways in which supporters of enhancement might appropriately respond to Habermas' arguments.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:07:02Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9f5679f1-94f1-4c54-b19c-390ae44426a2
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:07:02Z
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9f5679f1-94f1-4c54-b19c-390ae44426a22022-03-27T00:56:55ZAutonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re-examination of Habermas in the Enhancement DebateJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9f5679f1-94f1-4c54-b19c-390ae44426a2Ethics of the biosciencesPhilosophyEthics (Moral philosophy)Practical ethicsEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.2015Pugh, JJurgen Habermas has argued that carrying out pre-natal germline enhancements would be inimical to the future child's autonomy. In this article, I suggest that many of the objections that have been made against Habermas' arguments by liberals in the enhancement debate misconstrue his claims. To explain why, I begin by explaining how Habermas' view of personal autonomy confers particular importance to the agent's embodiment and social environment. In view of this, I explain that it is possible to draw two arguments against germline enhancements from Habermas' thought. I call these arguments ‘the argument from negative freedom’ and ‘the argument from natality’. Although I argue that many of the common liberal objections to Habermas are not applicable when his arguments are properly understood, I go on to suggest ways in which supporters of enhancement might appropriately respond to Habermas' arguments.
spellingShingle Ethics of the biosciences
Philosophy
Ethics (Moral philosophy)
Practical ethics
Pugh, J
Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re-examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate
title Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re-examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate
title_full Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re-examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate
title_fullStr Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re-examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate
title_full_unstemmed Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re-examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate
title_short Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re-examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate
title_sort autonomy natality and freedom a liberal re examination of habermas in the enhancement debate
topic Ethics of the biosciences
Philosophy
Ethics (Moral philosophy)
Practical ethics
work_keys_str_mv AT pughj autonomynatalityandfreedomaliberalreexaminationofhabermasintheenhancementdebate