The multinational nature of cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: Applied and methodological evidence to the conduct of economic evaluations alongside multinational clinical trials have appeared in the literature over the last decade. Nevertheless, little is known about the number and identity of countries participating in these studies. A structured...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rivero-Arias, O, Gray, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2010
_version_ 1797085345572978688
author Rivero-Arias, O
Gray, A
author_facet Rivero-Arias, O
Gray, A
author_sort Rivero-Arias, O
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVES: Applied and methodological evidence to the conduct of economic evaluations alongside multinational clinical trials have appeared in the literature over the last decade. Nevertheless, little is known about the number and identity of countries participating in these studies. A structured review was carried out to assess the reporting of the multinational nature of these studies. METHODS: A structured review was conducted by using online databases from January 1996 to December 2007. Articles were included if they reported cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multinational randomized trial with individual patient-level data on resource use and outcome in more than one country. Key data extracted included country information, sample size, unit cost collection, methods to calculate costs and effects, and the reporting of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Sixty-five studies out of a total of 591 articles identified in the original search fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Information about countries participating in the trial was not reported in 16 (26%) of the 65 studies. The overall sample size from all the randomized controlled trials identified was estimated to be 172,401 patients. Country-specific sample size was reported for 74,852 (43%) of the patients, but the country contribution was unknown for 97,549 (57%) of the participants. CONCLUSION: The reporting of the multinational nature of these studies is currently inadequate. Therefore, future guidelines of transferability of economic evaluations across settings should emphasize the importance of reporting the number and identity of countries and their contribution to the overall sample size in cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:07:39Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9f890cb5-7f4c-4ca2-a5b6-860f2e1f6cbf
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:07:39Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9f890cb5-7f4c-4ca2-a5b6-860f2e1f6cbf2022-03-27T00:58:38ZThe multinational nature of cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9f890cb5-7f4c-4ca2-a5b6-860f2e1f6cbfEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2010Rivero-Arias, OGray, A OBJECTIVES: Applied and methodological evidence to the conduct of economic evaluations alongside multinational clinical trials have appeared in the literature over the last decade. Nevertheless, little is known about the number and identity of countries participating in these studies. A structured review was carried out to assess the reporting of the multinational nature of these studies. METHODS: A structured review was conducted by using online databases from January 1996 to December 2007. Articles were included if they reported cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multinational randomized trial with individual patient-level data on resource use and outcome in more than one country. Key data extracted included country information, sample size, unit cost collection, methods to calculate costs and effects, and the reporting of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Sixty-five studies out of a total of 591 articles identified in the original search fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Information about countries participating in the trial was not reported in 16 (26%) of the 65 studies. The overall sample size from all the randomized controlled trials identified was estimated to be 172,401 patients. Country-specific sample size was reported for 74,852 (43%) of the patients, but the country contribution was unknown for 97,549 (57%) of the participants. CONCLUSION: The reporting of the multinational nature of these studies is currently inadequate. Therefore, future guidelines of transferability of economic evaluations across settings should emphasize the importance of reporting the number and identity of countries and their contribution to the overall sample size in cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.
spellingShingle Rivero-Arias, O
Gray, A
The multinational nature of cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.
title The multinational nature of cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.
title_full The multinational nature of cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.
title_fullStr The multinational nature of cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.
title_full_unstemmed The multinational nature of cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.
title_short The multinational nature of cost-effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials.
title_sort multinational nature of cost effectiveness analyses alongside multinational clinical trials
work_keys_str_mv AT riveroariaso themultinationalnatureofcosteffectivenessanalysesalongsidemultinationalclinicaltrials
AT graya themultinationalnatureofcosteffectivenessanalysesalongsidemultinationalclinicaltrials
AT riveroariaso multinationalnatureofcosteffectivenessanalysesalongsidemultinationalclinicaltrials
AT graya multinationalnatureofcosteffectivenessanalysesalongsidemultinationalclinicaltrials