Secularisation and the securitisation of the sacred a response to Lewin’s framing of the Gearon–Jackson debate
In this article, I make a response to Lewin’s insightful and judicious contribution to the Author–Jackson debate. I address the central and important arguments made by Lewin in relation to three aspects of my theoretical orientations on religion in education: (1) what Lewin rightly identifies as my...
Main Author: | Gearon, L |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Routledge
2017
|
Similar Items
-
Secularisation as the fragmentation of the sacred and of sacred space
by: van der Tol, M, et al.
Published: (2022) -
The counter-terrorist campus: Securitisation theory and university securitisation – Three Models
by: Gearon, L
Published: (2017) -
Lewin on Trusts
by: Simpson, E
Published: (2008) -
Research ethics in the securitised university
by: Gearon, L, et al.
Published: (2018) -
On secularisation - structural, institutional and cultural determinants shaping individual secularisation
by: Müller, T
Published: (2012)