The view from the interventionalist.

The development of percutaneous valve replacement has broadened the procedural interface between interventional cardiologists and their cardiothoracic surgical colleagues. Our relationship is no longer restricted to the arena of coronary artery disease, and opportunities now exist to share the care...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Banning, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2013
_version_ 1826288134167461888
author Banning, A
author_facet Banning, A
author_sort Banning, A
collection OXFORD
description The development of percutaneous valve replacement has broadened the procedural interface between interventional cardiologists and their cardiothoracic surgical colleagues. Our relationship is no longer restricted to the arena of coronary artery disease, and opportunities now exist to share the care of large numbers of high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. These complex professional relationships have a mutual dependence and many shared objectives that should be centred upon the optimal care of cardiac patients. However, the continuing evolution of technology demands that these relationships evolve with time. A failure to understand this need for mutual change and increased cooperation has previously led to a sense of competition and Departmental separation between cardiac intervention and surgery. These fractured relationships ultimately limit the quality of care that we deliver to our patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:09:08Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9fffe162-dcaa-4cbb-b4a3-c169c4f6e29c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:09:08Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9fffe162-dcaa-4cbb-b4a3-c169c4f6e29c2022-03-27T02:02:15ZThe view from the interventionalist.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9fffe162-dcaa-4cbb-b4a3-c169c4f6e29cEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Banning, AThe development of percutaneous valve replacement has broadened the procedural interface between interventional cardiologists and their cardiothoracic surgical colleagues. Our relationship is no longer restricted to the arena of coronary artery disease, and opportunities now exist to share the care of large numbers of high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. These complex professional relationships have a mutual dependence and many shared objectives that should be centred upon the optimal care of cardiac patients. However, the continuing evolution of technology demands that these relationships evolve with time. A failure to understand this need for mutual change and increased cooperation has previously led to a sense of competition and Departmental separation between cardiac intervention and surgery. These fractured relationships ultimately limit the quality of care that we deliver to our patients.
spellingShingle Banning, A
The view from the interventionalist.
title The view from the interventionalist.
title_full The view from the interventionalist.
title_fullStr The view from the interventionalist.
title_full_unstemmed The view from the interventionalist.
title_short The view from the interventionalist.
title_sort view from the interventionalist
work_keys_str_mv AT banninga theviewfromtheinterventionalist
AT banninga viewfromtheinterventionalist