The rise of cholesterol testing: how much is unnecessary.
BACKGROUND: Laboratory testing has increased dramatically over recent decades, which is a consequence particularly of repeat testing or monitoring, as either a response to treatment or follow-up. AIM: To assess rates of measurement of lipid levels (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, trigl...
Autori principali: | Doll, H, Shine, B, Kay, J, James, T, Glasziou, P |
---|---|
Natura: | Journal article |
Lingua: | English |
Pubblicazione: |
2011
|
Documenti analoghi
-
The rise of cholesterol testing: how much is unnecessary?
di: Doll, H, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2011) -
How much monitoring?
di: Glasziou, P
Pubblicazione: (2007) -
How much in vitro cholesterol reducing activity of lactobacilli predicts their in vivo cholesterol function?
di: Golnoush Madani, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2013-01-01) -
Do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms of overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment?
di: Barratt, A, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2012) -
When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.
di: Glasziou, P, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2007)