Packing dimension of mean porous measures

We prove that the packing dimension of any mean porous Radon measure on $\mathbb R^d$ may be estimated from above by a function which depends on mean porosity. The upper bound tends to $d-1$ as mean porosity tends to its maximum value. This result was stated in \cite{BS}, and in a weaker form in \ci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beliaev, D, Järvenpää, E, Järvenpää, M, Käenmäki, A, Rajala, T, Smirnov, S, Suomala, V
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2007
_version_ 1797085626777993216
author Beliaev, D
Järvenpää, E
Järvenpää, M
Käenmäki, A
Rajala, T
Smirnov, S
Suomala, V
author_facet Beliaev, D
Järvenpää, E
Järvenpää, M
Käenmäki, A
Rajala, T
Smirnov, S
Suomala, V
author_sort Beliaev, D
collection OXFORD
description We prove that the packing dimension of any mean porous Radon measure on $\mathbb R^d$ may be estimated from above by a function which depends on mean porosity. The upper bound tends to $d-1$ as mean porosity tends to its maximum value. This result was stated in \cite{BS}, and in a weaker form in \cite{JJ1}, but the proofs are not correct. Quite surprisingly, it turns out that mean porous measures are not necessarily approximable by mean porous sets. We verify this by constructing an example of a mean porous measure $\mu$ on $\mathbb R$ such that $\mu(A)=0$ for all mean porous sets $A\subset\mathbb R$.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:11:09Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a0b14aee-2ade-498d-a7ac-3643616c2cdd
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:11:09Z
publishDate 2007
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a0b14aee-2ade-498d-a7ac-3643616c2cdd2022-03-27T02:07:19ZPacking dimension of mean porous measuresJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a0b14aee-2ade-498d-a7ac-3643616c2cddEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2007Beliaev, DJärvenpää, EJärvenpää, MKäenmäki, ARajala, TSmirnov, SSuomala, VWe prove that the packing dimension of any mean porous Radon measure on $\mathbb R^d$ may be estimated from above by a function which depends on mean porosity. The upper bound tends to $d-1$ as mean porosity tends to its maximum value. This result was stated in \cite{BS}, and in a weaker form in \cite{JJ1}, but the proofs are not correct. Quite surprisingly, it turns out that mean porous measures are not necessarily approximable by mean porous sets. We verify this by constructing an example of a mean porous measure $\mu$ on $\mathbb R$ such that $\mu(A)=0$ for all mean porous sets $A\subset\mathbb R$.
spellingShingle Beliaev, D
Järvenpää, E
Järvenpää, M
Käenmäki, A
Rajala, T
Smirnov, S
Suomala, V
Packing dimension of mean porous measures
title Packing dimension of mean porous measures
title_full Packing dimension of mean porous measures
title_fullStr Packing dimension of mean porous measures
title_full_unstemmed Packing dimension of mean porous measures
title_short Packing dimension of mean porous measures
title_sort packing dimension of mean porous measures
work_keys_str_mv AT beliaevd packingdimensionofmeanporousmeasures
AT jarvenpaae packingdimensionofmeanporousmeasures
AT jarvenpaam packingdimensionofmeanporousmeasures
AT kaenmakia packingdimensionofmeanporousmeasures
AT rajalat packingdimensionofmeanporousmeasures
AT smirnovs packingdimensionofmeanporousmeasures
AT suomalav packingdimensionofmeanporousmeasures