Accessing inclusive well-being to leave no one behind
The world has continued to seek prosperity by reducing poverty and improving well-being, but it is vital to examine whether this improvement is inclusive. This paper presents a quantile-based assessment of trends based on absolute changes and allows for robust examination of the inclusiveness of mul...
| Những tác giả chính: | , |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Working paper |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative
2025
|
| _version_ | 1826317016826380288 |
|---|---|
| author | Seth, S Alkire, S |
| author_facet | Seth, S Alkire, S |
| author_sort | Seth, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The world has continued to seek prosperity by reducing poverty and improving well-being, but it is vital to examine whether this improvement is inclusive. This paper presents a quantile-based assessment of trends based on absolute changes and allows for robust examination of the inclusiveness of multidimensional well-being changes. The overall change in inclusive well-being can be decomposed into two components: the change in the overall average; and the <em>inclusivity premium</em> capturing the extent to which the change in well-being benefits the poorer quantiles. For our empirical illustration, we employ a multidimensional measure of well-being that is closely linked to the flagship global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). We examine the inclusiveness of multidimensional well-being changes for 75 developing countries across six geographic regions. We observe robust improvements in well-being levels for most countries, but only around three-fifths of these countries overall have positive robust inclusivity premiums, and fewer than one-third in sub-Saharan Africa. Our examination of the relationship between inclusivity premium in multidimensional well-being and the World Bank’s shared prosperity premium in monetary space does not yield any monotonic relationship across countries. Furthermore, despite the close link between our inclusive well-being measure and the global MPI, a successful absolute reduction in the global MPI does not necessarily imply that the corresponding well-being improvement is inclusive. Our proposed framework could play an important role in jointly monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals’ targets of reducing inequality within countries and reducing poverty in multiple dimensions. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:31:53Z |
| format | Working paper |
| id | oxford-uuid:a0b794f7-e3a1-46b7-a117-f3e3ba59b12f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:31:53Z |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:a0b794f7-e3a1-46b7-a117-f3e3ba59b12f2025-01-10T15:06:02ZAccessing inclusive well-being to leave no one behindWorking paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:a0b794f7-e3a1-46b7-a117-f3e3ba59b12fEnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative2025Seth, SAlkire, SThe world has continued to seek prosperity by reducing poverty and improving well-being, but it is vital to examine whether this improvement is inclusive. This paper presents a quantile-based assessment of trends based on absolute changes and allows for robust examination of the inclusiveness of multidimensional well-being changes. The overall change in inclusive well-being can be decomposed into two components: the change in the overall average; and the <em>inclusivity premium</em> capturing the extent to which the change in well-being benefits the poorer quantiles. For our empirical illustration, we employ a multidimensional measure of well-being that is closely linked to the flagship global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). We examine the inclusiveness of multidimensional well-being changes for 75 developing countries across six geographic regions. We observe robust improvements in well-being levels for most countries, but only around three-fifths of these countries overall have positive robust inclusivity premiums, and fewer than one-third in sub-Saharan Africa. Our examination of the relationship between inclusivity premium in multidimensional well-being and the World Bank’s shared prosperity premium in monetary space does not yield any monotonic relationship across countries. Furthermore, despite the close link between our inclusive well-being measure and the global MPI, a successful absolute reduction in the global MPI does not necessarily imply that the corresponding well-being improvement is inclusive. Our proposed framework could play an important role in jointly monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals’ targets of reducing inequality within countries and reducing poverty in multiple dimensions. |
| spellingShingle | Seth, S Alkire, S Accessing inclusive well-being to leave no one behind |
| title | Accessing inclusive well-being to leave no one behind |
| title_full | Accessing inclusive well-being to leave no one behind |
| title_fullStr | Accessing inclusive well-being to leave no one behind |
| title_full_unstemmed | Accessing inclusive well-being to leave no one behind |
| title_short | Accessing inclusive well-being to leave no one behind |
| title_sort | accessing inclusive well being to leave no one behind |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT seths accessinginclusivewellbeingtoleavenoonebehind AT alkires accessinginclusivewellbeingtoleavenoonebehind |