Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing M* from z = 2 to the present day

Utilizing optical and near-infrared broad-band photometry covering >5 deg2 in two of the most well-studied extragalactic legacy fields (COSMOS and XMM-LSS), we measure the galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) between 0.1 < z < 2.0. We explore in detail the effect of two source extraction met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adams, NJ, Bowler, RAA, Jarvis, MJ, Häußler, B, Lagos, CDP
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2021
_version_ 1797085846432645120
author Adams, NJ
Bowler, RAA
Jarvis, MJ
Häußler, B
Lagos, CDP
author_facet Adams, NJ
Bowler, RAA
Jarvis, MJ
Häußler, B
Lagos, CDP
author_sort Adams, NJ
collection OXFORD
description Utilizing optical and near-infrared broad-band photometry covering >5 deg2 in two of the most well-studied extragalactic legacy fields (COSMOS and XMM-LSS), we measure the galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) between 0.1 < z < 2.0. We explore in detail the effect of two source extraction methods (SExtractor and ProFound) in addition to the inclusion/exclusion of Spitzer IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 μm photometry when measuring the GSMF. We find that including IRAC data reduces the number of massive (log10(M/M⊙) > 11.25) galaxies found due to improved photometric redshift accuracy, but has little effect on the more numerous lower-mass galaxies. We fit the resultant GSMFs with double Schechter functions down to log10(M/M⊙) = 7.75 (9.75) at z = 0.1 (2.0) and find that the choice of source extraction software has no significant effect on the derived best-fitting parameters. However, the choice of methodology used to correct for the Eddington bias has a larger impact on the high-mass end of the GSMF, which can partly explain the spread in derived M* values from previous studies. Using an empirical correction to model the intrinsic GSMF, we find evidence for an evolving characteristic stellar mass with δlog10(M*/M⊙)/δz = −0.16±0.05(−0.11±0.05)⁠, when using SExtractor (ProFound). We argue that with widely quenched star formation rates in massive galaxies at low redshift (z < 0.5), additional growth via mergers is required in order to sustain such an evolution to a higher characteristic mass.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:13:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a18362d8-bfb6-42f9-ab13-e26fec9f981e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:13:43Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a18362d8-bfb6-42f9-ab13-e26fec9f981e2022-03-27T02:13:46ZEvolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing M* from z = 2 to the present dayJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a18362d8-bfb6-42f9-ab13-e26fec9f981eEnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2021Adams, NJBowler, RAAJarvis, MJHäußler, BLagos, CDPUtilizing optical and near-infrared broad-band photometry covering >5 deg2 in two of the most well-studied extragalactic legacy fields (COSMOS and XMM-LSS), we measure the galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) between 0.1 < z < 2.0. We explore in detail the effect of two source extraction methods (SExtractor and ProFound) in addition to the inclusion/exclusion of Spitzer IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 μm photometry when measuring the GSMF. We find that including IRAC data reduces the number of massive (log10(M/M⊙) > 11.25) galaxies found due to improved photometric redshift accuracy, but has little effect on the more numerous lower-mass galaxies. We fit the resultant GSMFs with double Schechter functions down to log10(M/M⊙) = 7.75 (9.75) at z = 0.1 (2.0) and find that the choice of source extraction software has no significant effect on the derived best-fitting parameters. However, the choice of methodology used to correct for the Eddington bias has a larger impact on the high-mass end of the GSMF, which can partly explain the spread in derived M* values from previous studies. Using an empirical correction to model the intrinsic GSMF, we find evidence for an evolving characteristic stellar mass with δlog10(M*/M⊙)/δz = −0.16±0.05(−0.11±0.05)⁠, when using SExtractor (ProFound). We argue that with widely quenched star formation rates in massive galaxies at low redshift (z < 0.5), additional growth via mergers is required in order to sustain such an evolution to a higher characteristic mass.
spellingShingle Adams, NJ
Bowler, RAA
Jarvis, MJ
Häußler, B
Lagos, CDP
Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing M* from z = 2 to the present day
title Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing M* from z = 2 to the present day
title_full Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing M* from z = 2 to the present day
title_fullStr Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing M* from z = 2 to the present day
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing M* from z = 2 to the present day
title_short Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing M* from z = 2 to the present day
title_sort evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function evidence for an increasing m from z 2 to the present day
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsnj evolutionofthegalaxystellarmassfunctionevidenceforanincreasingmfromz2tothepresentday
AT bowlerraa evolutionofthegalaxystellarmassfunctionevidenceforanincreasingmfromz2tothepresentday
AT jarvismj evolutionofthegalaxystellarmassfunctionevidenceforanincreasingmfromz2tothepresentday
AT haußlerb evolutionofthegalaxystellarmassfunctionevidenceforanincreasingmfromz2tothepresentday
AT lagoscdp evolutionofthegalaxystellarmassfunctionevidenceforanincreasingmfromz2tothepresentday