Confusing procedures with process when appraising the impact of cognitive bias modification on emotional vulnerability
If meta-analysis is to provide valuable answers, then it is critical to ensure clarity about the questions being asked. Here, we distinguish two important questions concerning cognitive bias modification research that are not differentiated in the meta-analysis recently published by Cristea et al (2...
Main Authors: | Grafton, B, MacLeod, C, Rudaizky, D, Holmes, E, Salemink, E, Fox, E, Notebaert, L |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Similar Items
-
Authors’ reply to "Processing confusing procedures in the recent re-analysis of a cognitive bias modification meta-analysis"
by: Grafton, B, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Introduction to the special section on cognitive bias modification in emotional disorders.
by: Koster, E, et al.
Published: (2009) -
When we should worry more: using cognitive bias modification to drive adaptive health behaviour
by: Notebaert, L, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles.
by: MacLeod, C, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Trait anxiety and the alignment of attentional bias with controllability of danger
by: Notebaert, L, et al.
Published: (2018)