Why heaven doesn't make earth absolutely meaningless, just relatively

In this article, I seek charitably to develop an argument suggested by Thaddeus Metz. This is an argument against the view that it is consistent to hold that, while our lives may have some meaningfulness even if there is no heavenly afterlife awaiting us, if there is such an afterlife, they are even...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mawson, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020
_version_ 1797085985953021952
author Mawson, T
author_facet Mawson, T
author_sort Mawson, T
collection OXFORD
description In this article, I seek charitably to develop an argument suggested by Thaddeus Metz. This is an argument against the view that it is consistent to hold that, while our lives may have some meaningfulness even if there is no heavenly afterlife awaiting us, if there is such an afterlife, they are even more meaningful, because heaven adds a potential infinity of meaningfulness. Having developed this argument on Metz's behalf, I criticize it. I conclude that – while throwing out a number of interesting ideas and possibilities along the way – no argument along Metz's lines can finally reach the conclusion aimed for.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:15:34Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a21e6621-fc1a-4643-99d5-132b3741c098
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:15:34Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a21e6621-fc1a-4643-99d5-132b3741c0982022-03-27T02:18:05ZWhy heaven doesn't make earth absolutely meaningless, just relativelyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a21e6621-fc1a-4643-99d5-132b3741c098EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordCambridge University Press2020Mawson, TIn this article, I seek charitably to develop an argument suggested by Thaddeus Metz. This is an argument against the view that it is consistent to hold that, while our lives may have some meaningfulness even if there is no heavenly afterlife awaiting us, if there is such an afterlife, they are even more meaningful, because heaven adds a potential infinity of meaningfulness. Having developed this argument on Metz's behalf, I criticize it. I conclude that – while throwing out a number of interesting ideas and possibilities along the way – no argument along Metz's lines can finally reach the conclusion aimed for.
spellingShingle Mawson, T
Why heaven doesn't make earth absolutely meaningless, just relatively
title Why heaven doesn't make earth absolutely meaningless, just relatively
title_full Why heaven doesn't make earth absolutely meaningless, just relatively
title_fullStr Why heaven doesn't make earth absolutely meaningless, just relatively
title_full_unstemmed Why heaven doesn't make earth absolutely meaningless, just relatively
title_short Why heaven doesn't make earth absolutely meaningless, just relatively
title_sort why heaven doesn t make earth absolutely meaningless just relatively
work_keys_str_mv AT mawsont whyheavendoesntmakeearthabsolutelymeaninglessjustrelatively