Health outcome prioritisation in Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the ethical landscape

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> Health outcome prioritisation is the ranking in order of desirability or importance of a set of disease related objectives and their associated cost or risk. We analyse the complex ethical landscape in which this takes place in the most common dementi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McKeown, A, Turner, A, Angehrn, Z, Gove, D, Ly, A, Nordon, C, Nelson, M, Tochel, C, Mittelstadt, B, Keenan, A, Smith, M, Singh, I
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: IOS Press 2020
_version_ 1797086041099730944
author McKeown, A
Turner, A
Angehrn, Z
Gove, D
Ly, A
Nordon, C
Nelson, M
Tochel, C
Mittelstadt, B
Keenan, A
Smith, M
Singh, I
author_facet McKeown, A
Turner, A
Angehrn, Z
Gove, D
Ly, A
Nordon, C
Nelson, M
Tochel, C
Mittelstadt, B
Keenan, A
Smith, M
Singh, I
author_sort McKeown, A
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Objective:</strong> Health outcome prioritisation is the ranking in order of desirability or importance of a set of disease related objectives and their associated cost or risk. We analyse the complex ethical landscape in which this takes place in the most common dementia, Alzheimer’s disease.</p> <p><strong>Background:</strong> Dementia has been described as the greatest global health challenge in the 21st century on account of longevity gains increasing its incidence, escalating health and social care pressures. These pressures highlight ethical, social, political challenges about healthcare resource allocation, what health improvements matter to patients, and how they are measured. This study highlights the complexity of the ethical landscape, relating particularly to the balances that need to be struck when allocating resources; when measuring and prioritising outcomes; and when individual preferences are sought.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> Narrative review of literature published since 2007, incorporating snowball sampling where necessary. We identified, thematised and discussed key issues of ethical salience.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Eight areas of ethical salience for outcome prioritisation emerged: (1) Public health and distributive justice, (2) Scarcity of resources, (3) Heterogeneity and changing circumstances, (4) Knowledge of treatment, (5) Values and circumstances, (6) Conflicting priorities, (7) Communication, autonomy and Caregiver issues, (8) Disclosure of risk.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> These areas highlight the difficult balance to be struck when allocating resources, when measuring and prioritising outcomes, and when individual preferences are sought. We conclude by reflecting on how tools in social sciences and ethics can help address challenges posed by resource allocation, measuring and prioritising outcomes, and eliciting stakeholder preferences.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:16:21Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a25f3cf2-8b6b-49fd-a581-e324c2db4693
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:16:21Z
publishDate 2020
publisher IOS Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a25f3cf2-8b6b-49fd-a581-e324c2db46932022-03-27T02:19:49ZHealth outcome prioritisation in Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the ethical landscapeJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a25f3cf2-8b6b-49fd-a581-e324c2db4693EnglishSymplectic ElementsIOS Press2020McKeown, ATurner, AAngehrn, ZGove, DLy, ANordon, CNelson, MTochel, CMittelstadt, BKeenan, ASmith, MSingh, I<p><strong>Objective:</strong> Health outcome prioritisation is the ranking in order of desirability or importance of a set of disease related objectives and their associated cost or risk. We analyse the complex ethical landscape in which this takes place in the most common dementia, Alzheimer’s disease.</p> <p><strong>Background:</strong> Dementia has been described as the greatest global health challenge in the 21st century on account of longevity gains increasing its incidence, escalating health and social care pressures. These pressures highlight ethical, social, political challenges about healthcare resource allocation, what health improvements matter to patients, and how they are measured. This study highlights the complexity of the ethical landscape, relating particularly to the balances that need to be struck when allocating resources; when measuring and prioritising outcomes; and when individual preferences are sought.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> Narrative review of literature published since 2007, incorporating snowball sampling where necessary. We identified, thematised and discussed key issues of ethical salience.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Eight areas of ethical salience for outcome prioritisation emerged: (1) Public health and distributive justice, (2) Scarcity of resources, (3) Heterogeneity and changing circumstances, (4) Knowledge of treatment, (5) Values and circumstances, (6) Conflicting priorities, (7) Communication, autonomy and Caregiver issues, (8) Disclosure of risk.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> These areas highlight the difficult balance to be struck when allocating resources, when measuring and prioritising outcomes, and when individual preferences are sought. We conclude by reflecting on how tools in social sciences and ethics can help address challenges posed by resource allocation, measuring and prioritising outcomes, and eliciting stakeholder preferences.</p>
spellingShingle McKeown, A
Turner, A
Angehrn, Z
Gove, D
Ly, A
Nordon, C
Nelson, M
Tochel, C
Mittelstadt, B
Keenan, A
Smith, M
Singh, I
Health outcome prioritisation in Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the ethical landscape
title Health outcome prioritisation in Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the ethical landscape
title_full Health outcome prioritisation in Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the ethical landscape
title_fullStr Health outcome prioritisation in Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the ethical landscape
title_full_unstemmed Health outcome prioritisation in Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the ethical landscape
title_short Health outcome prioritisation in Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the ethical landscape
title_sort health outcome prioritisation in alzheimer s disease understanding the ethical landscape
work_keys_str_mv AT mckeowna healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT turnera healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT angehrnz healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT goved healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT lya healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT nordonc healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT nelsonm healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT tochelc healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT mittelstadtb healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT keenana healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT smithm healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape
AT singhi healthoutcomeprioritisationinalzheimersdiseaseunderstandingtheethicallandscape