Persistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations

<p style="text-align:justify;">Transitional countries have struggled to overcome impunity for human rights violations committed by past authoritarian regimes. While some scholars have hailed the emergence of a ‘justice cascade’, a ‘justice revolution’, and an ‘age of accountability’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lessa, F, Olsen, T, Payne, L, Pereira, G, Reiter, A
Format: Journal article
Published: Cambridge University Press 2014
_version_ 1797086113087619072
author Lessa, F
Olsen, T
Payne, L
Pereira, G
Reiter, A
author_facet Lessa, F
Olsen, T
Payne, L
Pereira, G
Reiter, A
author_sort Lessa, F
collection OXFORD
description <p style="text-align:justify;">Transitional countries have struggled to overcome impunity for human rights violations committed by past authoritarian regimes. While some scholars have hailed the emergence of a ‘justice cascade’, a ‘justice revolution’, and an ‘age of accountability’, our research highlights the persistence of amnesty laws despite efforts to erode them. This article examines 63 amnesties for human rights violations committed by state agents that were enacted in 34 transitional countries from 1970 to 2011, and the 161 challenges that endeavoured to undermine the power of these laws.<br/> We find significant variation in the outcome of challenges. While some lead to the removal or weakening of amnesty laws, others validate them. We explain the variation using an explanatory model that focuses on the characteristics of four actors: civil society, international governmental and non-governmental agencies, domestic executives and judicial leaders. Time also plays a conditioning role in our framework. We illustrate our argument by presenting emblematic country case studies. We conclude that even when amnesty laws are displaced or eroded, impunity tends to persist in some form.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:17:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a2bce55e-f164-4f44-91c9-4aed44098b63
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:17:25Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a2bce55e-f164-4f44-91c9-4aed44098b632022-03-27T02:22:04ZPersistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a2bce55e-f164-4f44-91c9-4aed44098b63Symplectic Elements at OxfordCambridge University Press2014Lessa, FOlsen, TPayne, LPereira, GReiter, A <p style="text-align:justify;">Transitional countries have struggled to overcome impunity for human rights violations committed by past authoritarian regimes. While some scholars have hailed the emergence of a ‘justice cascade’, a ‘justice revolution’, and an ‘age of accountability’, our research highlights the persistence of amnesty laws despite efforts to erode them. This article examines 63 amnesties for human rights violations committed by state agents that were enacted in 34 transitional countries from 1970 to 2011, and the 161 challenges that endeavoured to undermine the power of these laws.<br/> We find significant variation in the outcome of challenges. While some lead to the removal or weakening of amnesty laws, others validate them. We explain the variation using an explanatory model that focuses on the characteristics of four actors: civil society, international governmental and non-governmental agencies, domestic executives and judicial leaders. Time also plays a conditioning role in our framework. We illustrate our argument by presenting emblematic country case studies. We conclude that even when amnesty laws are displaced or eroded, impunity tends to persist in some form.</p>
spellingShingle Lessa, F
Olsen, T
Payne, L
Pereira, G
Reiter, A
Persistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations
title Persistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations
title_full Persistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations
title_fullStr Persistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations
title_full_unstemmed Persistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations
title_short Persistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations
title_sort persistent or eroding impunity the divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations
work_keys_str_mv AT lessaf persistentorerodingimpunitythedivergenteffectsoflegalchallengestoamnestylawsforpasthumanrightsviolations
AT olsent persistentorerodingimpunitythedivergenteffectsoflegalchallengestoamnestylawsforpasthumanrightsviolations
AT paynel persistentorerodingimpunitythedivergenteffectsoflegalchallengestoamnestylawsforpasthumanrightsviolations
AT pereirag persistentorerodingimpunitythedivergenteffectsoflegalchallengestoamnestylawsforpasthumanrightsviolations
AT reitera persistentorerodingimpunitythedivergenteffectsoflegalchallengestoamnestylawsforpasthumanrightsviolations