Relative concerns on visible consumption: a source of economic distortions

Do relative concerns on visible consumption give rise to economic distortions? We re-examine the question posited by Arrow and Dasgupta (2009) building upon their theoretical framework but recognizing that relative concerns can only apply to visible goods (e.g., cars, clothing, jewelry) and that ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quintana-Domeque, C, Turino, F
Format: Working paper
Published: University of Oxford 2013
_version_ 1797086293777186816
author Quintana-Domeque, C
Turino, F
author_facet Quintana-Domeque, C
Turino, F
author_sort Quintana-Domeque, C
collection OXFORD
description Do relative concerns on visible consumption give rise to economic distortions? We re-examine the question posited by Arrow and Dasgupta (2009) building upon their theoretical framework but recognizing that relative concerns can only apply to visible goods (e.g., cars, clothing, jewelry) and that households consume both visible and non-visible goods. Contrary to Arrow and Dasgupta (2009), the answer to this question turns to be always affirmative: the competitive equilibrium marginal rate of substitution between the visible and non-visible goods will always be different than the socially optimal one, since individuals do not take into account the negative externality they exert on others through the consumption of the visible good, while the social planner does. If one is willing to invoke separability assumptions, then the steady state competitive equilibrium consumption of non-visible goods will be strictly lower than the socially optimal one, consistent with expenditure patterns both in developed and developing countries.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:20:00Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:a39306fd-666a-4a15-bd50-4a913d6b39b6
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:20:00Z
publishDate 2013
publisher University of Oxford
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a39306fd-666a-4a15-bd50-4a913d6b39b62022-03-27T02:28:03ZRelative concerns on visible consumption: a source of economic distortionsWorking paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:a39306fd-666a-4a15-bd50-4a913d6b39b6Bulk import via SwordSymplectic ElementsUniversity of Oxford2013Quintana-Domeque, CTurino, FDo relative concerns on visible consumption give rise to economic distortions? We re-examine the question posited by Arrow and Dasgupta (2009) building upon their theoretical framework but recognizing that relative concerns can only apply to visible goods (e.g., cars, clothing, jewelry) and that households consume both visible and non-visible goods. Contrary to Arrow and Dasgupta (2009), the answer to this question turns to be always affirmative: the competitive equilibrium marginal rate of substitution between the visible and non-visible goods will always be different than the socially optimal one, since individuals do not take into account the negative externality they exert on others through the consumption of the visible good, while the social planner does. If one is willing to invoke separability assumptions, then the steady state competitive equilibrium consumption of non-visible goods will be strictly lower than the socially optimal one, consistent with expenditure patterns both in developed and developing countries.
spellingShingle Quintana-Domeque, C
Turino, F
Relative concerns on visible consumption: a source of economic distortions
title Relative concerns on visible consumption: a source of economic distortions
title_full Relative concerns on visible consumption: a source of economic distortions
title_fullStr Relative concerns on visible consumption: a source of economic distortions
title_full_unstemmed Relative concerns on visible consumption: a source of economic distortions
title_short Relative concerns on visible consumption: a source of economic distortions
title_sort relative concerns on visible consumption a source of economic distortions
work_keys_str_mv AT quintanadomequec relativeconcernsonvisibleconsumptionasourceofeconomicdistortions
AT turinof relativeconcernsonvisibleconsumptionasourceofeconomicdistortions