Competing discourses of workplace health.

This article presents an analysis of workplace health programme discourses within an international information technology company. Discourse refers to a system of statements that share a common force and coherence and which are socially constitutive. The representation of entities such as workplace...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allender, S, Colquhoun, D, Kelly, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2006
_version_ 1797086435448193024
author Allender, S
Colquhoun, D
Kelly, P
author_facet Allender, S
Colquhoun, D
Kelly, P
author_sort Allender, S
collection OXFORD
description This article presents an analysis of workplace health programme discourses within an international information technology company. Discourse refers to a system of statements that share a common force and coherence and which are socially constitutive. The representation of entities such as workplace health can be subject to competition between discourses. A critical discourse analysis was undertaken on semi-structured interviews, participant observation and workplace health programme documents. Two competing discourses were identified: health as safety and health as lifestyle. Each discourse is described and shown to both implicitly and explicitly define health within this particular workplace. Lifestyle discourse encouraged moves towards linking of the employees' working and private lives while safety discourse defined health in the relationship between workers and their physical environment. Competition between discourses both constricts and opens spaces for alternative understandings of health in the workplace. The implications of this competition for workplace health policy and practice are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:22:02Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a442ce81-2428-4568-b539-fd77f19e0f12
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:22:02Z
publishDate 2006
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a442ce81-2428-4568-b539-fd77f19e0f122022-03-27T02:32:39ZCompeting discourses of workplace health.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a442ce81-2428-4568-b539-fd77f19e0f12EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2006Allender, SColquhoun, DKelly, PThis article presents an analysis of workplace health programme discourses within an international information technology company. Discourse refers to a system of statements that share a common force and coherence and which are socially constitutive. The representation of entities such as workplace health can be subject to competition between discourses. A critical discourse analysis was undertaken on semi-structured interviews, participant observation and workplace health programme documents. Two competing discourses were identified: health as safety and health as lifestyle. Each discourse is described and shown to both implicitly and explicitly define health within this particular workplace. Lifestyle discourse encouraged moves towards linking of the employees' working and private lives while safety discourse defined health in the relationship between workers and their physical environment. Competition between discourses both constricts and opens spaces for alternative understandings of health in the workplace. The implications of this competition for workplace health policy and practice are discussed.
spellingShingle Allender, S
Colquhoun, D
Kelly, P
Competing discourses of workplace health.
title Competing discourses of workplace health.
title_full Competing discourses of workplace health.
title_fullStr Competing discourses of workplace health.
title_full_unstemmed Competing discourses of workplace health.
title_short Competing discourses of workplace health.
title_sort competing discourses of workplace health
work_keys_str_mv AT allenders competingdiscoursesofworkplacehealth
AT colquhound competingdiscoursesofworkplacehealth
AT kellyp competingdiscoursesofworkplacehealth