A scoping review shows that several nonvalidated budget planning tools for randomized trials are available
<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> We aimed to provide a systematic overview of freely available tools which may help plan or monitor costs for randomized clinical trials (RCTs).</p> <p><strong>Study Design and Setting:</strong> We systematically searched MEDLI...
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | Speich, B, Gloy, V, Schur, N, Ewald, H, Hemkens, L, Schwenkglenks, M, Briel, M |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Journal article |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Elsevier
2019
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Systematic review on costs and resource use of randomized clinical trials shows a lack of transparent and comprehensive data
حسب: Speich, B, وآخرون
منشور في: (2017) -
Scoping review and characteristics of publicly available checklists for assessing clinical trial feasibility
حسب: Viktoria Gloy, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022-05-01) -
A cross-sectional study on item analysis of prevalidated and nonvalidated anatomy multiple-choice questions
حسب: Varsha Shenoy, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023-01-01) -
Comparison of randomized controlled trials discontinued or revised for poor recruitment and completed trials with the same research question: a matched qualitative study
حسب: Briel, M, وآخرون
منشور في: (2019) -
Retrospective assessment of resource use and costs in two investigator-initiated randomized trials exemplified a comprehensive cost item list
حسب: Speich, B, وآخرون
منشور في: (2017)