The plausibility of September‐November Congo Basin rainfall change in coupled climate models
As one of three global hot spots of tropical convection, potential future changes to the Congo Basin climate system will have regional and tropics‐wide implications. However, the latest generation of climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 disagree on the sign and magnitude o...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Geophysical Union
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797086553768460288 |
|---|---|
| author | Creese, A Washington, R Munday, C |
| author_facet | Creese, A Washington, R Munday, C |
| author_sort | Creese, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | As one of three global hot spots of tropical convection, potential future changes to the Congo Basin climate system will have regional and tropics‐wide implications. However, the latest generation of climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 disagree on the sign and magnitude of future change and diverge in their estimation of the historical rainfall climatology. This study assesses the plausibility of different signals of future rainfall change by examining the processes relating to rainfall projections in samples of historically wet or dry models during the September–November rainy season. In the west Congo Basin, there are no significant differences in rainfall change projections in models that are historically wet or dry. Both composites feature wetting in the north (up to 1.8 mm/day) and drying in the south, associated with enhanced tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures, increased evaporation, and enhanced low‐level moisture flux into the basin. In the east Congo Basin, there is greater evidence that differences in model historical climatologies has an influence on the magnitude of future rainfall change. Historically wet models project significant wetting in the northeast (1.19 mm/day) associated with a weakened northern component of the African Easterly Jet (AEJ) and enhanced moisture convergence. Dry models do not capture the structure of the AEJs in the historical period, and so changes to the AEJs under warming do not produce the same wetting pattern. The analysis therefore casts doubt on the plausibility of the driest rainfall change signals in the east Congo Basin. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:23:45Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:a4e032c0-485a-41a7-968c-153f754756cd |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:23:45Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | American Geophysical Union |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:a4e032c0-485a-41a7-968c-153f754756cd2022-03-27T02:36:43ZThe plausibility of September‐November Congo Basin rainfall change in coupled climate modelsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a4e032c0-485a-41a7-968c-153f754756cdEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordAmerican Geophysical Union2019Creese, AWashington, RMunday, CAs one of three global hot spots of tropical convection, potential future changes to the Congo Basin climate system will have regional and tropics‐wide implications. However, the latest generation of climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 disagree on the sign and magnitude of future change and diverge in their estimation of the historical rainfall climatology. This study assesses the plausibility of different signals of future rainfall change by examining the processes relating to rainfall projections in samples of historically wet or dry models during the September–November rainy season. In the west Congo Basin, there are no significant differences in rainfall change projections in models that are historically wet or dry. Both composites feature wetting in the north (up to 1.8 mm/day) and drying in the south, associated with enhanced tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures, increased evaporation, and enhanced low‐level moisture flux into the basin. In the east Congo Basin, there is greater evidence that differences in model historical climatologies has an influence on the magnitude of future rainfall change. Historically wet models project significant wetting in the northeast (1.19 mm/day) associated with a weakened northern component of the African Easterly Jet (AEJ) and enhanced moisture convergence. Dry models do not capture the structure of the AEJs in the historical period, and so changes to the AEJs under warming do not produce the same wetting pattern. The analysis therefore casts doubt on the plausibility of the driest rainfall change signals in the east Congo Basin. |
| spellingShingle | Creese, A Washington, R Munday, C The plausibility of September‐November Congo Basin rainfall change in coupled climate models |
| title | The plausibility of September‐November Congo Basin rainfall change in coupled climate models |
| title_full | The plausibility of September‐November Congo Basin rainfall change in coupled climate models |
| title_fullStr | The plausibility of September‐November Congo Basin rainfall change in coupled climate models |
| title_full_unstemmed | The plausibility of September‐November Congo Basin rainfall change in coupled climate models |
| title_short | The plausibility of September‐November Congo Basin rainfall change in coupled climate models |
| title_sort | plausibility of september november congo basin rainfall change in coupled climate models |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT creesea theplausibilityofseptembernovembercongobasinrainfallchangeincoupledclimatemodels AT washingtonr theplausibilityofseptembernovembercongobasinrainfallchangeincoupledclimatemodels AT mundayc theplausibilityofseptembernovembercongobasinrainfallchangeincoupledclimatemodels AT creesea plausibilityofseptembernovembercongobasinrainfallchangeincoupledclimatemodels AT washingtonr plausibilityofseptembernovembercongobasinrainfallchangeincoupledclimatemodels AT mundayc plausibilityofseptembernovembercongobasinrainfallchangeincoupledclimatemodels |