Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control
Theories of authoritarianism assert that autocratic governments follow repressive and redistributive policies which impede mass mobilization and mitigate economic grievances to prevent regime instability. However, policy formulation and implementation remain opaque and under-theorized elements of au...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
_version_ | 1826289208079155200 |
---|---|
author | Thomson, H |
author_facet | Thomson, H |
author_sort | Thomson, H |
collection | OXFORD |
description | Theories of authoritarianism assert that autocratic governments follow repressive and redistributive policies which impede mass mobilization and mitigate economic grievances to prevent regime instability. However, policy formulation and implementation remain opaque and under-theorized elements of authoritarian politics. I argue that the mix of repressive and redistributive policies chosen by a regime is a function of intra-elite conflict between hard-liners and soft-liners. The power of the two factions and their influence on policy evolve as members of the elite learn to judge the comparative advantages of the regime in repression and redistribution. Hard-liners will be ascendant in regimes with a comparative advantage in repression, while soft-liners will be ascendant in regimes with a comparative advantage in redistribution. I illustrate these arguments with an account of the East German regime’s response to the June 17 uprising in 1953, including analysis of an original dataset on secret police informants and food supplies after the unrest. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:25:23Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:a566ded9-8e89-48e9-9322-5ab5e185e8ba |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:25:23Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:a566ded9-8e89-48e9-9322-5ab5e185e8ba2022-03-27T02:40:18ZRegime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian controlJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a566ded9-8e89-48e9-9322-5ab5e185e8baSymplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2016Thomson, HTheories of authoritarianism assert that autocratic governments follow repressive and redistributive policies which impede mass mobilization and mitigate economic grievances to prevent regime instability. However, policy formulation and implementation remain opaque and under-theorized elements of authoritarian politics. I argue that the mix of repressive and redistributive policies chosen by a regime is a function of intra-elite conflict between hard-liners and soft-liners. The power of the two factions and their influence on policy evolve as members of the elite learn to judge the comparative advantages of the regime in repression and redistribution. Hard-liners will be ascendant in regimes with a comparative advantage in repression, while soft-liners will be ascendant in regimes with a comparative advantage in redistribution. I illustrate these arguments with an account of the East German regime’s response to the June 17 uprising in 1953, including analysis of an original dataset on secret police informants and food supplies after the unrest. |
spellingShingle | Thomson, H Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control |
title | Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control |
title_full | Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control |
title_fullStr | Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control |
title_full_unstemmed | Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control |
title_short | Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control |
title_sort | regime structures intra elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomsonh regimestructuresintraelitefactionsandtheproblemofauthoritariancontrol |