Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control

Theories of authoritarianism assert that autocratic governments follow repressive and redistributive policies which impede mass mobilization and mitigate economic grievances to prevent regime instability. However, policy formulation and implementation remain opaque and under-theorized elements of au...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomson, H
Format: Journal article
Published: SAGE Publications 2016
_version_ 1826289208079155200
author Thomson, H
author_facet Thomson, H
author_sort Thomson, H
collection OXFORD
description Theories of authoritarianism assert that autocratic governments follow repressive and redistributive policies which impede mass mobilization and mitigate economic grievances to prevent regime instability. However, policy formulation and implementation remain opaque and under-theorized elements of authoritarian politics. I argue that the mix of repressive and redistributive policies chosen by a regime is a function of intra-elite conflict between hard-liners and soft-liners. The power of the two factions and their influence on policy evolve as members of the elite learn to judge the comparative advantages of the regime in repression and redistribution. Hard-liners will be ascendant in regimes with a comparative advantage in repression, while soft-liners will be ascendant in regimes with a comparative advantage in redistribution. I illustrate these arguments with an account of the East German regime’s response to the June 17 uprising in 1953, including analysis of an original dataset on secret police informants and food supplies after the unrest.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:25:23Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a566ded9-8e89-48e9-9322-5ab5e185e8ba
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:25:23Z
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a566ded9-8e89-48e9-9322-5ab5e185e8ba2022-03-27T02:40:18ZRegime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian controlJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a566ded9-8e89-48e9-9322-5ab5e185e8baSymplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2016Thomson, HTheories of authoritarianism assert that autocratic governments follow repressive and redistributive policies which impede mass mobilization and mitigate economic grievances to prevent regime instability. However, policy formulation and implementation remain opaque and under-theorized elements of authoritarian politics. I argue that the mix of repressive and redistributive policies chosen by a regime is a function of intra-elite conflict between hard-liners and soft-liners. The power of the two factions and their influence on policy evolve as members of the elite learn to judge the comparative advantages of the regime in repression and redistribution. Hard-liners will be ascendant in regimes with a comparative advantage in repression, while soft-liners will be ascendant in regimes with a comparative advantage in redistribution. I illustrate these arguments with an account of the East German regime’s response to the June 17 uprising in 1953, including analysis of an original dataset on secret police informants and food supplies after the unrest.
spellingShingle Thomson, H
Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control
title Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control
title_full Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control
title_fullStr Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control
title_full_unstemmed Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control
title_short Regime structures, intra-elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control
title_sort regime structures intra elite factions and the problem of authoritarian control
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonh regimestructuresintraelitefactionsandtheproblemofauthoritariancontrol