Consent for medical treatment of trans youth: a comparative analysis of the law in Australia and in England and Wales

Clinical and legal regulation of consent to medical treatment for trans youth, both binary and non-binary, is complex as well as controversial. In this article, we outline the clinical context in which consent is sought for gender-affirming medical treatment of trans youth in Australia and in Englan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jowatt, S, Mathews, B, Herring, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Monash University Publishing 2024
_version_ 1811139742089084928
author Jowatt, S
Mathews, B
Herring, J
author_facet Jowatt, S
Mathews, B
Herring, J
author_sort Jowatt, S
collection OXFORD
description Clinical and legal regulation of consent to medical treatment for trans youth, both binary and non-binary, is complex as well as controversial. In this article, we outline the clinical context in which consent is sought for gender-affirming medical treatment of trans youth in Australia and in England and Wales. Then, informed by an understanding of the developing evidence base behind early gender-affirming treatment, the lived experience of trans young people, and a developmental approach to capacity in decision-making regarding medical treatment, this article goes on to consider the justifiability of current legal regulation in this area. First, this article examines general principles in relation to consent for children’s medical care, then charts the development of those principles through key cases that have shaped this particular area of law in Australia, England and Wales. These developments are then synthesised and compared in respect of the extent to which they promote or impede autonomous decision-making in the respective jurisdictions. We identify decisive similarities and differences between the jurisdictions, along with the likely practical implications for trans youth, their families, and treating doctors. Our analysis adds further weight to the growing consensus spanning the judiciary, doctors, legal scholars, and interest groups, that the law in Australia should be reformed to reduce unnecessary and harmful barriers to treatment for all trans youth.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:27:59Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a60c350a-e59b-4099-a4fb-bc8011c957a1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:10:55Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Monash University Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a60c350a-e59b-4099-a4fb-bc8011c957a12024-06-24T10:59:12ZConsent for medical treatment of trans youth: a comparative analysis of the law in Australia and in England and WalesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a60c350a-e59b-4099-a4fb-bc8011c957a1EnglishSymplectic ElementsMonash University Publishing2024Jowatt, SMathews, BHerring, JClinical and legal regulation of consent to medical treatment for trans youth, both binary and non-binary, is complex as well as controversial. In this article, we outline the clinical context in which consent is sought for gender-affirming medical treatment of trans youth in Australia and in England and Wales. Then, informed by an understanding of the developing evidence base behind early gender-affirming treatment, the lived experience of trans young people, and a developmental approach to capacity in decision-making regarding medical treatment, this article goes on to consider the justifiability of current legal regulation in this area. First, this article examines general principles in relation to consent for children’s medical care, then charts the development of those principles through key cases that have shaped this particular area of law in Australia, England and Wales. These developments are then synthesised and compared in respect of the extent to which they promote or impede autonomous decision-making in the respective jurisdictions. We identify decisive similarities and differences between the jurisdictions, along with the likely practical implications for trans youth, their families, and treating doctors. Our analysis adds further weight to the growing consensus spanning the judiciary, doctors, legal scholars, and interest groups, that the law in Australia should be reformed to reduce unnecessary and harmful barriers to treatment for all trans youth.
spellingShingle Jowatt, S
Mathews, B
Herring, J
Consent for medical treatment of trans youth: a comparative analysis of the law in Australia and in England and Wales
title Consent for medical treatment of trans youth: a comparative analysis of the law in Australia and in England and Wales
title_full Consent for medical treatment of trans youth: a comparative analysis of the law in Australia and in England and Wales
title_fullStr Consent for medical treatment of trans youth: a comparative analysis of the law in Australia and in England and Wales
title_full_unstemmed Consent for medical treatment of trans youth: a comparative analysis of the law in Australia and in England and Wales
title_short Consent for medical treatment of trans youth: a comparative analysis of the law in Australia and in England and Wales
title_sort consent for medical treatment of trans youth a comparative analysis of the law in australia and in england and wales
work_keys_str_mv AT jowatts consentformedicaltreatmentoftransyouthacomparativeanalysisofthelawinaustraliaandinenglandandwales
AT mathewsb consentformedicaltreatmentoftransyouthacomparativeanalysisofthelawinaustraliaandinenglandandwales
AT herringj consentformedicaltreatmentoftransyouthacomparativeanalysisofthelawinaustraliaandinenglandandwales