Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and net benefit performance of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) across five European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), 1 United Kingdom, 1 Austrian, and 3 US biopsy cohorts. METHODS: PCPTRC...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: Ankerst, D, Boeck, A, Freedland, S, Thompson, I, Cronin, A, Roobol, M, Hugosson, J, Stephen Jones, J, Kattan, M, Klein, E, Hamdy, F, Neal, D, Donovan, J, Parekh, D, Klocker, H, Horninger, W, Benchikh, A, Salama, G, Villers, A, Moreira, D, Schröder, F, Lilja, H, Vickers, A
Materyal Türü: Journal article
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2012
_version_ 1826289334039347200
author Ankerst, D
Boeck, A
Freedland, S
Thompson, I
Cronin, A
Roobol, M
Hugosson, J
Stephen Jones, J
Kattan, M
Klein, E
Hamdy, F
Neal, D
Donovan, J
Parekh, D
Klocker, H
Horninger, W
Benchikh, A
Salama, G
Villers, A
Moreira, D
Schröder, F
Lilja, H
Vickers, A
author_facet Ankerst, D
Boeck, A
Freedland, S
Thompson, I
Cronin, A
Roobol, M
Hugosson, J
Stephen Jones, J
Kattan, M
Klein, E
Hamdy, F
Neal, D
Donovan, J
Parekh, D
Klocker, H
Horninger, W
Benchikh, A
Salama, G
Villers, A
Moreira, D
Schröder, F
Lilja, H
Vickers, A
author_sort Ankerst, D
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and net benefit performance of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) across five European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), 1 United Kingdom, 1 Austrian, and 3 US biopsy cohorts. METHODS: PCPTRC risks were calculated for 25,733 biopsies using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, family history, history of prior biopsy, and imputation for missing covariates. Predictions were evaluated using the areas underneath the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), discrimination slopes, chi-square tests of goodness of fit, and net benefit decision curves. RESULTS: AUCs of the PCPTRC ranged from a low of 56% in the ERSPC Goeteborg Rounds 2-6 cohort to a high of 72% in the ERSPC Goeteborg Round 1 cohort and were statistically significantly higher than that of PSA in 6 out of the 10 cohorts. The PCPTRC was well calibrated in the SABOR, Tyrol, and Durham cohorts. There was limited to no net benefit to using the PCPTRC for biopsy referral compared to biopsying all or no men in all five ERSPC cohorts and benefit within a limited range of risk thresholds in all other cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: External validation of the PCPTRC across ten cohorts revealed varying degree of success highly dependent on the cohort, most likely due to different criteria for and work-up before biopsy. Future validation studies of new calculators for prostate cancer should acknowledge the potential impact of the specific cohort studied when reporting successful versus failed validation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:27:17Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a60de66b-a50f-4129-a85d-91bcd3fcd809
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:27:17Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a60de66b-a50f-4129-a85d-91bcd3fcd8092022-03-27T02:44:36ZEvaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a60de66b-a50f-4129-a85d-91bcd3fcd809EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Ankerst, DBoeck, AFreedland, SThompson, ICronin, ARoobol, MHugosson, JStephen Jones, JKattan, MKlein, EHamdy, FNeal, DDonovan, JParekh, DKlocker, HHorninger, WBenchikh, ASalama, GVillers, AMoreira, DSchröder, FLilja, HVickers, AOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and net benefit performance of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) across five European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), 1 United Kingdom, 1 Austrian, and 3 US biopsy cohorts. METHODS: PCPTRC risks were calculated for 25,733 biopsies using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, family history, history of prior biopsy, and imputation for missing covariates. Predictions were evaluated using the areas underneath the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), discrimination slopes, chi-square tests of goodness of fit, and net benefit decision curves. RESULTS: AUCs of the PCPTRC ranged from a low of 56% in the ERSPC Goeteborg Rounds 2-6 cohort to a high of 72% in the ERSPC Goeteborg Round 1 cohort and were statistically significantly higher than that of PSA in 6 out of the 10 cohorts. The PCPTRC was well calibrated in the SABOR, Tyrol, and Durham cohorts. There was limited to no net benefit to using the PCPTRC for biopsy referral compared to biopsying all or no men in all five ERSPC cohorts and benefit within a limited range of risk thresholds in all other cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: External validation of the PCPTRC across ten cohorts revealed varying degree of success highly dependent on the cohort, most likely due to different criteria for and work-up before biopsy. Future validation studies of new calculators for prostate cancer should acknowledge the potential impact of the specific cohort studied when reporting successful versus failed validation.
spellingShingle Ankerst, D
Boeck, A
Freedland, S
Thompson, I
Cronin, A
Roobol, M
Hugosson, J
Stephen Jones, J
Kattan, M
Klein, E
Hamdy, F
Neal, D
Donovan, J
Parekh, D
Klocker, H
Horninger, W
Benchikh, A
Salama, G
Villers, A
Moreira, D
Schröder, F
Lilja, H
Vickers, A
Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
title Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
title_full Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
title_fullStr Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
title_short Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
title_sort evaluating the pcpt risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group
work_keys_str_mv AT ankerstd evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT boecka evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT freedlands evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT thompsoni evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT cronina evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT roobolm evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT hugossonj evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT stephenjonesj evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT kattanm evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT kleine evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT hamdyf evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT neald evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT donovanj evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT parekhd evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT klockerh evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT horningerw evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT benchikha evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT salamag evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT villersa evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT moreirad evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT schroderf evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT liljah evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup
AT vickersa evaluatingthepcptriskcalculatorinteninternationalbiopsycohortsresultsfromtheprostatebiopsycollaborativegroup