A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013.

BACKGROUND: The collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) within the national PROMs programme for elective procedures is now established mandatory practice in the NHS with high response rates and completion. OBJECTIVES: This review examines the evidence of PROMs for people with skin ca...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Gibbons, E, Casañas Comabella, C, Fitzpatrick, R
বিন্যাস: Journal article
ভাষা:English
প্রকাশিত: 2013
_version_ 1826289621606072320
author Gibbons, E
Casañas Comabella, C
Fitzpatrick, R
author_facet Gibbons, E
Casañas Comabella, C
Fitzpatrick, R
author_sort Gibbons, E
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: The collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) within the national PROMs programme for elective procedures is now established mandatory practice in the NHS with high response rates and completion. OBJECTIVES: This review examines the evidence of PROMs for people with skin cancer. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were conducted using several sources and databases, using a detailed search strategy developed by the University of Oxford's PROM Group. Articles were assessed for eligibility. Data were extracted per PROM for each measurement property and appraised using an appraisal framework. RESULTS: A total of 3517 articles were identified in the searches, and 28 were included in the final review after assessment by two independent reviewers. Two generic instruments (SF-36 and Sickness Impact Profile) and nine condition-specific PROMs were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is a limited volume of published evidence for the application of generic PROMs for people with skin cancer. Evaluation of the EQ-5D may be particularly important given its widespread use in many other healthcare contexts in the U.K. The Skin Cancer Index could be considered for piloting in the NHS. For patients with nonmelanoma skin cancers, the Skindex measures may also be considered. The SCQOLIT has some evidence of applicability across both skin cancer types but more evaluations are needed. The FACT-M does have more promising characteristics for patients with malignant melanomas although no evidence of testing in the U.K. was found. The forthcoming EORTC-M may prove a useful measure given the expertise and track record of this European collaboration in cancer and quality of life.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:31:41Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a771884c-9a62-4054-bae1-890927f09458
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:31:41Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a771884c-9a62-4054-bae1-890927f094582022-03-27T02:54:40ZA structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a771884c-9a62-4054-bae1-890927f09458EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Gibbons, ECasañas Comabella, CFitzpatrick, RBACKGROUND: The collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) within the national PROMs programme for elective procedures is now established mandatory practice in the NHS with high response rates and completion. OBJECTIVES: This review examines the evidence of PROMs for people with skin cancer. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were conducted using several sources and databases, using a detailed search strategy developed by the University of Oxford's PROM Group. Articles were assessed for eligibility. Data were extracted per PROM for each measurement property and appraised using an appraisal framework. RESULTS: A total of 3517 articles were identified in the searches, and 28 were included in the final review after assessment by two independent reviewers. Two generic instruments (SF-36 and Sickness Impact Profile) and nine condition-specific PROMs were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is a limited volume of published evidence for the application of generic PROMs for people with skin cancer. Evaluation of the EQ-5D may be particularly important given its widespread use in many other healthcare contexts in the U.K. The Skin Cancer Index could be considered for piloting in the NHS. For patients with nonmelanoma skin cancers, the Skindex measures may also be considered. The SCQOLIT has some evidence of applicability across both skin cancer types but more evaluations are needed. The FACT-M does have more promising characteristics for patients with malignant melanomas although no evidence of testing in the U.K. was found. The forthcoming EORTC-M may prove a useful measure given the expertise and track record of this European collaboration in cancer and quality of life.
spellingShingle Gibbons, E
Casañas Comabella, C
Fitzpatrick, R
A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013.
title A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013.
title_full A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013.
title_fullStr A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013.
title_full_unstemmed A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013.
title_short A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013.
title_sort structured review of patient reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer 2013
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbonse astructuredreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithskincancer2013
AT casanascomabellac astructuredreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithskincancer2013
AT fitzpatrickr astructuredreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithskincancer2013
AT gibbonse structuredreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithskincancer2013
AT casanascomabellac structuredreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithskincancer2013
AT fitzpatrickr structuredreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithskincancer2013