Does structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia? A cost-effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) Trial

<p><strong>Background</strong><br/> Previous studies suggest that physical exercise could slow dementia progression. However, evidence for the cost effectiveness of structured exercise is conflicting and based on small trials.</p><br/> <p><strong>Objec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khan, I, Petrou, S, Khan, K, Mistry, D, Lall, R, Sheehan, B, Lamb, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2018
_version_ 1826289688731713536
author Khan, I
Petrou, S
Khan, K
Mistry, D
Lall, R
Sheehan, B
Lamb, S
author_facet Khan, I
Petrou, S
Khan, K
Mistry, D
Lall, R
Sheehan, B
Lamb, S
author_sort Khan, I
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Background</strong><br/> Previous studies suggest that physical exercise could slow dementia progression. However, evidence for the cost effectiveness of structured exercise is conflicting and based on small trials.</p><br/> <p><strong>Objectives</strong><br/> The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of a tailored, structured, moderate- to high-intensity exercise programme versus usual care in people with mild to moderate dementia.</p><br/> <p><strong>Methods</strong><br/> An economic evaluation was conducted from the UK National Health Service and personal social services perspective, based on data from a large randomised controlled trial. The primary clinical outcome was the participant reported ADAS-Cog (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale) at 12 months. Costs (£; 2014–2015 prices) were collected prospectively over a 12-month follow-up period. A bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with multiple imputation of missing data, was conducted with the view to estimating the incremental cost per QALY gained and the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) associated with the exercise programme plus usual care versus usual care. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of uncertainty surrounding aspects of the economic evaluation, and pre-specified subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness results.</p><br/> <p><strong>Results</strong><br/> Participants (n = 494) were randomised to exercise plus usual care or usual care only. By 12 months the mean ADAS-Cog score had worsened slightly to 25.2 (standard deviation [SD] 12.3) in the exercise arm and 23.8 (SD 10.4) in the usual care: difference − 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 2.6 to − 0.2 (p = 0.03). The mean (standard error [SE]) costs over 12 months for experimental versus control was £5945 (USD7856) versus £4597 (USD6574), respectively; (difference: £1347 [$1926]; p = 0.0426). Mean (SE) QALY estimates were 0.787 (0.012) versus 0.826 (0.019), respectively (p = 0.090). The probability that the exercise programme is cost effective was &lt; 1% across cost-effectiveness thresholds. INMBs ranged between –£2601 (USD3719) and £2158 (USD3086) at cost-effectiveness thresholds between £15,000 (USD21,450) and £30,000 (USD42,900) per QALY. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust to several sensitivity and subgroup analyses.</p><br/> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong><br/> Building on the clinical results of the trial, which showed that the structured exercise programme evaluated does not slow cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia, this economic evaluation shows that the programme is not cost effective.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:32:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a7ca7495-28a0-48d7-8906-65002212ee4c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:32:42Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Nature
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a7ca7495-28a0-48d7-8906-65002212ee4c2022-03-27T02:56:52ZDoes structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia? A cost-effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) TrialJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a7ca7495-28a0-48d7-8906-65002212ee4cEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Nature2018Khan, IPetrou, SKhan, KMistry, DLall, RSheehan, BLamb, S<p><strong>Background</strong><br/> Previous studies suggest that physical exercise could slow dementia progression. However, evidence for the cost effectiveness of structured exercise is conflicting and based on small trials.</p><br/> <p><strong>Objectives</strong><br/> The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of a tailored, structured, moderate- to high-intensity exercise programme versus usual care in people with mild to moderate dementia.</p><br/> <p><strong>Methods</strong><br/> An economic evaluation was conducted from the UK National Health Service and personal social services perspective, based on data from a large randomised controlled trial. The primary clinical outcome was the participant reported ADAS-Cog (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale) at 12 months. Costs (£; 2014–2015 prices) were collected prospectively over a 12-month follow-up period. A bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with multiple imputation of missing data, was conducted with the view to estimating the incremental cost per QALY gained and the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) associated with the exercise programme plus usual care versus usual care. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of uncertainty surrounding aspects of the economic evaluation, and pre-specified subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness results.</p><br/> <p><strong>Results</strong><br/> Participants (n = 494) were randomised to exercise plus usual care or usual care only. By 12 months the mean ADAS-Cog score had worsened slightly to 25.2 (standard deviation [SD] 12.3) in the exercise arm and 23.8 (SD 10.4) in the usual care: difference − 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 2.6 to − 0.2 (p = 0.03). The mean (standard error [SE]) costs over 12 months for experimental versus control was £5945 (USD7856) versus £4597 (USD6574), respectively; (difference: £1347 [$1926]; p = 0.0426). Mean (SE) QALY estimates were 0.787 (0.012) versus 0.826 (0.019), respectively (p = 0.090). The probability that the exercise programme is cost effective was &lt; 1% across cost-effectiveness thresholds. INMBs ranged between –£2601 (USD3719) and £2158 (USD3086) at cost-effectiveness thresholds between £15,000 (USD21,450) and £30,000 (USD42,900) per QALY. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust to several sensitivity and subgroup analyses.</p><br/> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong><br/> Building on the clinical results of the trial, which showed that the structured exercise programme evaluated does not slow cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia, this economic evaluation shows that the programme is not cost effective.</p>
spellingShingle Khan, I
Petrou, S
Khan, K
Mistry, D
Lall, R
Sheehan, B
Lamb, S
Does structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia? A cost-effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) Trial
title Does structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia? A cost-effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) Trial
title_full Does structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia? A cost-effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) Trial
title_fullStr Does structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia? A cost-effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) Trial
title_full_unstemmed Does structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia? A cost-effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) Trial
title_short Does structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia? A cost-effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) Trial
title_sort does structured exercise improve cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia a cost effectiveness analysis from a confirmatory randomised controlled trial the dementia and physical activity dapa trial
work_keys_str_mv AT khani doesstructuredexerciseimprovecognitiveimpairmentinpeoplewithmildtomoderatedementiaacosteffectivenessanalysisfromaconfirmatoryrandomisedcontrolledtrialthedementiaandphysicalactivitydapatrial
AT petrous doesstructuredexerciseimprovecognitiveimpairmentinpeoplewithmildtomoderatedementiaacosteffectivenessanalysisfromaconfirmatoryrandomisedcontrolledtrialthedementiaandphysicalactivitydapatrial
AT khank doesstructuredexerciseimprovecognitiveimpairmentinpeoplewithmildtomoderatedementiaacosteffectivenessanalysisfromaconfirmatoryrandomisedcontrolledtrialthedementiaandphysicalactivitydapatrial
AT mistryd doesstructuredexerciseimprovecognitiveimpairmentinpeoplewithmildtomoderatedementiaacosteffectivenessanalysisfromaconfirmatoryrandomisedcontrolledtrialthedementiaandphysicalactivitydapatrial
AT lallr doesstructuredexerciseimprovecognitiveimpairmentinpeoplewithmildtomoderatedementiaacosteffectivenessanalysisfromaconfirmatoryrandomisedcontrolledtrialthedementiaandphysicalactivitydapatrial
AT sheehanb doesstructuredexerciseimprovecognitiveimpairmentinpeoplewithmildtomoderatedementiaacosteffectivenessanalysisfromaconfirmatoryrandomisedcontrolledtrialthedementiaandphysicalactivitydapatrial
AT lambs doesstructuredexerciseimprovecognitiveimpairmentinpeoplewithmildtomoderatedementiaacosteffectivenessanalysisfromaconfirmatoryrandomisedcontrolledtrialthedementiaandphysicalactivitydapatrial