Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers
The Oxford WebQ is an online 24-hour dietary questionnaire that is appropriate for repeated administration in large-scale prospective studies, including the UK Biobank study and the Million Women Study. We compared the performance of the Oxford WebQ and a traditional interviewer-administered multipl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
_version_ | 1797087257868369920 |
---|---|
author | Greenwood, D Hardie, L Frost, G Alwan, N Bradbury, K Carter, M Elliott, P Evans, C Ford, H Hancock, N Key, T Liu, B Morris, M Mulla, U Petropoulou, K Potter, G Riboli, E Young, H Wark, P Cade, J |
author_facet | Greenwood, D Hardie, L Frost, G Alwan, N Bradbury, K Carter, M Elliott, P Evans, C Ford, H Hancock, N Key, T Liu, B Morris, M Mulla, U Petropoulou, K Potter, G Riboli, E Young, H Wark, P Cade, J |
author_sort | Greenwood, D |
collection | OXFORD |
description | The Oxford WebQ is an online 24-hour dietary questionnaire that is appropriate for repeated administration in large-scale prospective studies, including the UK Biobank study and the Million Women Study. We compared the performance of the Oxford WebQ and a traditional interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-hour dietary recall against biomarkers for protein, potassium, and total sugar intake and total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry. We recruited 160 participants in London, United Kingdom, between 2014 and 2016 and measured their biomarker levels at 3 nonconsecutive time points. The measurement error model simultaneously compared all 3 methods. Attenuation factors for protein, potassium, total sugar, and total energy intakes estimated as the mean of 2 applications of the Oxford WebQ were 0.37, 0.42, 0.45, and 0.31, respectively, with performance improving incrementally for the mean of more measures. Correlation between the mean value from 2 Oxford WebQs and estimated true intakes, reflecting attenuation when intake is categorized or ranked, was 0.47, 0.39, 0.40, and 0.38, respectively, also improving with repeated administration. These correlations were similar to those of the more administratively burdensome interviewer-based recall. Using objective biomarkers as the standard, the Oxford WebQ performs well across key nutrients in comparison with more administratively burdensome interviewer-based 24-hour recalls. Attenuation improves when the average value is taken over repeated administrations, reducing measurement error bias in assessment of diet-disease associations. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:33:16Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:a7f138a9-147a-47e7-b0d2-30cba60ce2fe |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:33:16Z |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:a7f138a9-147a-47e7-b0d2-30cba60ce2fe2022-03-27T02:58:01ZValidation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkersJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a7f138a9-147a-47e7-b0d2-30cba60ce2feSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2019Greenwood, DHardie, LFrost, GAlwan, NBradbury, KCarter, MElliott, PEvans, CFord, HHancock, NKey, TLiu, BMorris, MMulla, UPetropoulou, KPotter, GRiboli, EYoung, HWark, PCade, JThe Oxford WebQ is an online 24-hour dietary questionnaire that is appropriate for repeated administration in large-scale prospective studies, including the UK Biobank study and the Million Women Study. We compared the performance of the Oxford WebQ and a traditional interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-hour dietary recall against biomarkers for protein, potassium, and total sugar intake and total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry. We recruited 160 participants in London, United Kingdom, between 2014 and 2016 and measured their biomarker levels at 3 nonconsecutive time points. The measurement error model simultaneously compared all 3 methods. Attenuation factors for protein, potassium, total sugar, and total energy intakes estimated as the mean of 2 applications of the Oxford WebQ were 0.37, 0.42, 0.45, and 0.31, respectively, with performance improving incrementally for the mean of more measures. Correlation between the mean value from 2 Oxford WebQs and estimated true intakes, reflecting attenuation when intake is categorized or ranked, was 0.47, 0.39, 0.40, and 0.38, respectively, also improving with repeated administration. These correlations were similar to those of the more administratively burdensome interviewer-based recall. Using objective biomarkers as the standard, the Oxford WebQ performs well across key nutrients in comparison with more administratively burdensome interviewer-based 24-hour recalls. Attenuation improves when the average value is taken over repeated administrations, reducing measurement error bias in assessment of diet-disease associations. |
spellingShingle | Greenwood, D Hardie, L Frost, G Alwan, N Bradbury, K Carter, M Elliott, P Evans, C Ford, H Hancock, N Key, T Liu, B Morris, M Mulla, U Petropoulou, K Potter, G Riboli, E Young, H Wark, P Cade, J Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers |
title | Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers |
title_full | Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers |
title_short | Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers |
title_sort | validation of the oxford webq online 24 hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenwoodd validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT hardiel validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT frostg validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT alwann validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT bradburyk validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT carterm validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT elliottp validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT evansc validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT fordh validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT hancockn validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT keyt validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT liub validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT morrism validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT mullau validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT petropoulouk validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT potterg validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT ribolie validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT youngh validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT warkp validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers AT cadej validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers |