Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers

The Oxford WebQ is an online 24-hour dietary questionnaire that is appropriate for repeated administration in large-scale prospective studies, including the UK Biobank study and the Million Women Study. We compared the performance of the Oxford WebQ and a traditional interviewer-administered multipl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Greenwood, D, Hardie, L, Frost, G, Alwan, N, Bradbury, K, Carter, M, Elliott, P, Evans, C, Ford, H, Hancock, N, Key, T, Liu, B, Morris, M, Mulla, U, Petropoulou, K, Potter, G, Riboli, E, Young, H, Wark, P, Cade, J
Format: Journal article
Published: Oxford University Press 2019
_version_ 1797087257868369920
author Greenwood, D
Hardie, L
Frost, G
Alwan, N
Bradbury, K
Carter, M
Elliott, P
Evans, C
Ford, H
Hancock, N
Key, T
Liu, B
Morris, M
Mulla, U
Petropoulou, K
Potter, G
Riboli, E
Young, H
Wark, P
Cade, J
author_facet Greenwood, D
Hardie, L
Frost, G
Alwan, N
Bradbury, K
Carter, M
Elliott, P
Evans, C
Ford, H
Hancock, N
Key, T
Liu, B
Morris, M
Mulla, U
Petropoulou, K
Potter, G
Riboli, E
Young, H
Wark, P
Cade, J
author_sort Greenwood, D
collection OXFORD
description The Oxford WebQ is an online 24-hour dietary questionnaire that is appropriate for repeated administration in large-scale prospective studies, including the UK Biobank study and the Million Women Study. We compared the performance of the Oxford WebQ and a traditional interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-hour dietary recall against biomarkers for protein, potassium, and total sugar intake and total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry. We recruited 160 participants in London, United Kingdom, between 2014 and 2016 and measured their biomarker levels at 3 nonconsecutive time points. The measurement error model simultaneously compared all 3 methods. Attenuation factors for protein, potassium, total sugar, and total energy intakes estimated as the mean of 2 applications of the Oxford WebQ were 0.37, 0.42, 0.45, and 0.31, respectively, with performance improving incrementally for the mean of more measures. Correlation between the mean value from 2 Oxford WebQs and estimated true intakes, reflecting attenuation when intake is categorized or ranked, was 0.47, 0.39, 0.40, and 0.38, respectively, also improving with repeated administration. These correlations were similar to those of the more administratively burdensome interviewer-based recall. Using objective biomarkers as the standard, the Oxford WebQ performs well across key nutrients in comparison with more administratively burdensome interviewer-based 24-hour recalls. Attenuation improves when the average value is taken over repeated administrations, reducing measurement error bias in assessment of diet-disease associations.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:33:16Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:a7f138a9-147a-47e7-b0d2-30cba60ce2fe
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:33:16Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:a7f138a9-147a-47e7-b0d2-30cba60ce2fe2022-03-27T02:58:01ZValidation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkersJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a7f138a9-147a-47e7-b0d2-30cba60ce2feSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2019Greenwood, DHardie, LFrost, GAlwan, NBradbury, KCarter, MElliott, PEvans, CFord, HHancock, NKey, TLiu, BMorris, MMulla, UPetropoulou, KPotter, GRiboli, EYoung, HWark, PCade, JThe Oxford WebQ is an online 24-hour dietary questionnaire that is appropriate for repeated administration in large-scale prospective studies, including the UK Biobank study and the Million Women Study. We compared the performance of the Oxford WebQ and a traditional interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-hour dietary recall against biomarkers for protein, potassium, and total sugar intake and total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry. We recruited 160 participants in London, United Kingdom, between 2014 and 2016 and measured their biomarker levels at 3 nonconsecutive time points. The measurement error model simultaneously compared all 3 methods. Attenuation factors for protein, potassium, total sugar, and total energy intakes estimated as the mean of 2 applications of the Oxford WebQ were 0.37, 0.42, 0.45, and 0.31, respectively, with performance improving incrementally for the mean of more measures. Correlation between the mean value from 2 Oxford WebQs and estimated true intakes, reflecting attenuation when intake is categorized or ranked, was 0.47, 0.39, 0.40, and 0.38, respectively, also improving with repeated administration. These correlations were similar to those of the more administratively burdensome interviewer-based recall. Using objective biomarkers as the standard, the Oxford WebQ performs well across key nutrients in comparison with more administratively burdensome interviewer-based 24-hour recalls. Attenuation improves when the average value is taken over repeated administrations, reducing measurement error bias in assessment of diet-disease associations.
spellingShingle Greenwood, D
Hardie, L
Frost, G
Alwan, N
Bradbury, K
Carter, M
Elliott, P
Evans, C
Ford, H
Hancock, N
Key, T
Liu, B
Morris, M
Mulla, U
Petropoulou, K
Potter, G
Riboli, E
Young, H
Wark, P
Cade, J
Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers
title Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers
title_full Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers
title_fullStr Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers
title_short Validation of the Oxford WebQ online 24-hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers
title_sort validation of the oxford webq online 24 hour dietary questionnaire using biomarkers
work_keys_str_mv AT greenwoodd validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT hardiel validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT frostg validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT alwann validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT bradburyk validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT carterm validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT elliottp validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT evansc validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT fordh validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT hancockn validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT keyt validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT liub validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT morrism validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT mullau validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT petropoulouk validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT potterg validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT ribolie validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT youngh validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT warkp validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers
AT cadej validationoftheoxfordwebqonline24hourdietaryquestionnaireusingbiomarkers