A behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision-making under risk.
Making the best choice when faced with a chain of decisions requires a person to judge both anticipated outcomes and future actions. Although economic decision-making models account for both risk and reward in single-choice contexts, there is a dearth of similar knowledge about sequential choice. Cl...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2010
|
| _version_ | 1826289790509645824 |
|---|---|
| author | Symmonds, M Bossaerts, P Dolan, R |
| author_facet | Symmonds, M Bossaerts, P Dolan, R |
| author_sort | Symmonds, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Making the best choice when faced with a chain of decisions requires a person to judge both anticipated outcomes and future actions. Although economic decision-making models account for both risk and reward in single-choice contexts, there is a dearth of similar knowledge about sequential choice. Classical utility-based models assume that decision-makers select and follow an optimal predetermined strategy, regardless of the particular order in which options are presented. An alternative model involves continuously reevaluating decision utilities, without prescribing a specific future set of choices. Here, using behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, we studied human subjects in a sequential choice task and use these data to compare alternative decision models of valuation and strategy selection. We provide evidence that subjects adopt a model of reevaluating decision utilities, in which available strategies are continuously updated and combined in assessing action values. We validate this model by using simultaneously acquired fMRI data to show that sequential choice evokes a pattern of neural response consistent with a tracking of anticipated distribution of future reward, as expected in such a model. Thus, brain activity evoked at each decision point reflects the expected mean, variance, and skewness of possible payoffs, consistent with the idea that sequential choice evokes a prospective evaluation of both available strategies and possible outcomes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:34:16Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:a842ab17-dec4-4ca1-a86c-ad505cf098d8 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:34:16Z |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:a842ab17-dec4-4ca1-a86c-ad505cf098d82022-03-27T03:00:13ZA behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision-making under risk.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a842ab17-dec4-4ca1-a86c-ad505cf098d8EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Symmonds, MBossaerts, PDolan, RMaking the best choice when faced with a chain of decisions requires a person to judge both anticipated outcomes and future actions. Although economic decision-making models account for both risk and reward in single-choice contexts, there is a dearth of similar knowledge about sequential choice. Classical utility-based models assume that decision-makers select and follow an optimal predetermined strategy, regardless of the particular order in which options are presented. An alternative model involves continuously reevaluating decision utilities, without prescribing a specific future set of choices. Here, using behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, we studied human subjects in a sequential choice task and use these data to compare alternative decision models of valuation and strategy selection. We provide evidence that subjects adopt a model of reevaluating decision utilities, in which available strategies are continuously updated and combined in assessing action values. We validate this model by using simultaneously acquired fMRI data to show that sequential choice evokes a pattern of neural response consistent with a tracking of anticipated distribution of future reward, as expected in such a model. Thus, brain activity evoked at each decision point reflects the expected mean, variance, and skewness of possible payoffs, consistent with the idea that sequential choice evokes a prospective evaluation of both available strategies and possible outcomes. |
| spellingShingle | Symmonds, M Bossaerts, P Dolan, R A behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision-making under risk. |
| title | A behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision-making under risk. |
| title_full | A behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision-making under risk. |
| title_fullStr | A behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision-making under risk. |
| title_full_unstemmed | A behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision-making under risk. |
| title_short | A behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision-making under risk. |
| title_sort | behavioral and neural evaluation of prospective decision making under risk |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT symmondsm abehavioralandneuralevaluationofprospectivedecisionmakingunderrisk AT bossaertsp abehavioralandneuralevaluationofprospectivedecisionmakingunderrisk AT dolanr abehavioralandneuralevaluationofprospectivedecisionmakingunderrisk AT symmondsm behavioralandneuralevaluationofprospectivedecisionmakingunderrisk AT bossaertsp behavioralandneuralevaluationofprospectivedecisionmakingunderrisk AT dolanr behavioralandneuralevaluationofprospectivedecisionmakingunderrisk |