A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others
People are self-biased for rewards. We place a higher value on rewards if we receive them than if other people do. However, existing work has ignored one of the most powerful theorems from behavioural ecology of how animals seek resources in everyday life, the Marginal Value Theorem (MVT), which acc...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Research
2024
|
| _version_ | 1826315264404226048 |
|---|---|
| author | Contreras-Huerta, LS Pisauro, MA Küchenhoff, S Gekiere, A Le Heron, C Lockwood, PL Apps, MAJ |
| author_facet | Contreras-Huerta, LS Pisauro, MA Küchenhoff, S Gekiere, A Le Heron, C Lockwood, PL Apps, MAJ |
| author_sort | Contreras-Huerta, LS |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | People are self-biased for rewards. We place a higher value on rewards if we receive them than if other people do. However, existing work has ignored one of the most powerful theorems from behavioural ecology of how animals seek resources in everyday life, the Marginal Value Theorem (MVT), which accounts for optimal behaviour for maximising resources intake rate. Does this self-bias help humans maximise rewards when foraging for their own benefit compared to foraging for the benefit of others? Participants had to decide when to leave patches where reward intake was gradually depleting, in environments with different average reward rates. Half of the time participants foraged for themselves, and in the other half they collected rewards for an anonymous stranger. The optimal MVT derived solution states people should leave when the instantaneous reward intake in a patch equals the average rate in an environment. Across two studies, people were more optimal when foraging for self, showing a reduced sensitivity to instantaneous rewards when foraging for other. Autistic traits were linked to reduced sensitivity to reward rates when foraging for self but not for other. These results highlight that the self-bias may be adaptive, helping people maximise reward intake. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-09T03:22:46Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:a9c2c286-8b81-4eb2-a9eb-3f7ddb4595bd |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-09T03:22:46Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Nature Research |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:a9c2c286-8b81-4eb2-a9eb-3f7ddb4595bd2024-11-15T20:03:28ZA reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than othersJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:a9c2c286-8b81-4eb2-a9eb-3f7ddb4595bdEnglishJisc Publications RouterNature Research2024Contreras-Huerta, LSPisauro, MAKüchenhoff, SGekiere, ALe Heron, CLockwood, PLApps, MAJPeople are self-biased for rewards. We place a higher value on rewards if we receive them than if other people do. However, existing work has ignored one of the most powerful theorems from behavioural ecology of how animals seek resources in everyday life, the Marginal Value Theorem (MVT), which accounts for optimal behaviour for maximising resources intake rate. Does this self-bias help humans maximise rewards when foraging for their own benefit compared to foraging for the benefit of others? Participants had to decide when to leave patches where reward intake was gradually depleting, in environments with different average reward rates. Half of the time participants foraged for themselves, and in the other half they collected rewards for an anonymous stranger. The optimal MVT derived solution states people should leave when the instantaneous reward intake in a patch equals the average rate in an environment. Across two studies, people were more optimal when foraging for self, showing a reduced sensitivity to instantaneous rewards when foraging for other. Autistic traits were linked to reduced sensitivity to reward rates when foraging for self but not for other. These results highlight that the self-bias may be adaptive, helping people maximise reward intake. |
| spellingShingle | Contreras-Huerta, LS Pisauro, MA Küchenhoff, S Gekiere, A Le Heron, C Lockwood, PL Apps, MAJ A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others |
| title | A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others |
| title_full | A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others |
| title_fullStr | A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others |
| title_full_unstemmed | A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others |
| title_short | A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others |
| title_sort | reward self bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT contrerashuertals arewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT pisauroma arewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT kuchenhoffs arewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT gekierea arewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT leheronc arewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT lockwoodpl arewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT appsmaj arewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT contrerashuertals rewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT pisauroma rewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT kuchenhoffs rewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT gekierea rewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT leheronc rewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT lockwoodpl rewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers AT appsmaj rewardselfbiasleadstomoreoptimalforagingforourselvesthanothers |