Integration and search engine bias
Competition authorities all over the world worry that integration between search engines (mainly Google) and publishers could lead to abuses of dominant position. In particular, one concern is that of own-content bias, meaning that Google would bias its rankings in favor of the publishers it owns o...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working paper |
| Published: |
University of Oxford
2013
|
| _version_ | 1797087714959425536 |
|---|---|
| author | de Corniere, A Taylor, G |
| author_facet | de Corniere, A Taylor, G |
| author_sort | de Corniere, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Competition authorities all over the world worry that integration between search engines (mainly Google) and publishers could lead to abuses of dominant position. In particular, one concern is that of own-content bias, meaning that Google would bias its rankings in favor of the publishers it owns or has an interest in, to the detriment of competitors and users. In order to investigate this issue, we develop a theoretical framework in which the search engine (i) allocates users across publishers, and (ii) competes with publishers to attract advertisers. We show that the search engine is biased against publishers that display many ads - even without integration. Although integration may lead to own-content bias, it can also reduce bias by increasing the value of a marginal consumer to the search engine. Integration also has a positive effect on users by reducing the nuisance costs due to excessive advertising. Its net effect is therefore ambiguous in general, and we provide sufficient conditions for it to be desirable or not. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:39:38Z |
| format | Working paper |
| id | oxford-uuid:a9fd89f2-6fbb-4fa3-bf28-86a24ae90319 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:39:38Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | University of Oxford |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:a9fd89f2-6fbb-4fa3-bf28-86a24ae903192022-03-27T03:12:08ZIntegration and search engine biasWorking paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:a9fd89f2-6fbb-4fa3-bf28-86a24ae90319Symplectic ElementsBulk import via SwordUniversity of Oxford2013de Corniere, ATaylor, GCompetition authorities all over the world worry that integration between search engines (mainly Google) and publishers could lead to abuses of dominant position. In particular, one concern is that of own-content bias, meaning that Google would bias its rankings in favor of the publishers it owns or has an interest in, to the detriment of competitors and users. In order to investigate this issue, we develop a theoretical framework in which the search engine (i) allocates users across publishers, and (ii) competes with publishers to attract advertisers. We show that the search engine is biased against publishers that display many ads - even without integration. Although integration may lead to own-content bias, it can also reduce bias by increasing the value of a marginal consumer to the search engine. Integration also has a positive effect on users by reducing the nuisance costs due to excessive advertising. Its net effect is therefore ambiguous in general, and we provide sufficient conditions for it to be desirable or not. |
| spellingShingle | de Corniere, A Taylor, G Integration and search engine bias |
| title | Integration and search engine bias |
| title_full | Integration and search engine bias |
| title_fullStr | Integration and search engine bias |
| title_full_unstemmed | Integration and search engine bias |
| title_short | Integration and search engine bias |
| title_sort | integration and search engine bias |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT decornierea integrationandsearchenginebias AT taylorg integrationandsearchenginebias |