Everything is Uncertain and Uncertainty is Everything: Strategic Voting in Simple Plurality Elections.

Intuition tells us that strategic voting is most likely in marginal constituencies where the preferred party is a long way behind the second placed parity. Some formal theories suggest there should be complete desertion of all but two candidates (Palfrey 1989), or additionally that the second and th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Myatt, D, Fisher, S
Format: Working paper
Language:English
Published: Department of Economics (University of Oxford) 2002
_version_ 1826290170034388992
author Myatt, D
Fisher, S
author_facet Myatt, D
Fisher, S
author_sort Myatt, D
collection OXFORD
description Intuition tells us that strategic voting is most likely in marginal constituencies where the preferred party is a long way behind the second placed parity. Some formal theories suggest there should be complete desertion of all but two candidates (Palfrey 1989), or additionally that the second and third will have similar vote shares (Cox 1997). Unfortunately, these theories fail to account for uncertainty over the strength of candidates. We present a model that allows for such uncertainty. It generates interesting and original comparative statics. All three approaches are tested against English voting data from 1987, 1992 and 1997. Our model fits the data; the standard intuition and Cox hypothesis do not. Thus formal theory can improve on intuition. But, this depends on the realization that voters are uncertain, and it is only uncertainty that matters for strategic voting.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:40:05Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:aa22b158-f194-497d-bd16-04f91b30a26f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:40:05Z
publishDate 2002
publisher Department of Economics (University of Oxford)
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:aa22b158-f194-497d-bd16-04f91b30a26f2022-03-27T03:13:12ZEverything is Uncertain and Uncertainty is Everything: Strategic Voting in Simple Plurality Elections.Working paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:aa22b158-f194-497d-bd16-04f91b30a26fEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetDepartment of Economics (University of Oxford)2002Myatt, DFisher, SIntuition tells us that strategic voting is most likely in marginal constituencies where the preferred party is a long way behind the second placed parity. Some formal theories suggest there should be complete desertion of all but two candidates (Palfrey 1989), or additionally that the second and third will have similar vote shares (Cox 1997). Unfortunately, these theories fail to account for uncertainty over the strength of candidates. We present a model that allows for such uncertainty. It generates interesting and original comparative statics. All three approaches are tested against English voting data from 1987, 1992 and 1997. Our model fits the data; the standard intuition and Cox hypothesis do not. Thus formal theory can improve on intuition. But, this depends on the realization that voters are uncertain, and it is only uncertainty that matters for strategic voting.
spellingShingle Myatt, D
Fisher, S
Everything is Uncertain and Uncertainty is Everything: Strategic Voting in Simple Plurality Elections.
title Everything is Uncertain and Uncertainty is Everything: Strategic Voting in Simple Plurality Elections.
title_full Everything is Uncertain and Uncertainty is Everything: Strategic Voting in Simple Plurality Elections.
title_fullStr Everything is Uncertain and Uncertainty is Everything: Strategic Voting in Simple Plurality Elections.
title_full_unstemmed Everything is Uncertain and Uncertainty is Everything: Strategic Voting in Simple Plurality Elections.
title_short Everything is Uncertain and Uncertainty is Everything: Strategic Voting in Simple Plurality Elections.
title_sort everything is uncertain and uncertainty is everything strategic voting in simple plurality elections
work_keys_str_mv AT myattd everythingisuncertainanduncertaintyiseverythingstrategicvotinginsimplepluralityelections
AT fishers everythingisuncertainanduncertaintyiseverythingstrategicvotinginsimplepluralityelections