Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol

<p><strong>Objective:</strong><br /> The objective of this review is to describe the global evidence of gender inequity among individuals with appointments at academic institutions that conduct health research, and examine how gender intersects with other social identities to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tricco, AC, Lachance, CC, Rios, P, Darvesh, N, Antony, J, Radhakrishnan, A, Anand, SS, Baxter, N, Burns, KEA, Coyle, D, Curran, JA, Fiest, K, Graham, ID, Hawker, G, Légaré, F, Watt, J, Witteman, HO, Clark, JP, Bourgeault, IL, Leigh, JP, Ahmed, SB, Lawford, K, Aiken, A, Falk-Krzesinski, HJ, Langlois, EV, McCabe, C, Shepperd, S, Skidmore, B, Pattani, R, Leon, N, Lundine, J, Adisso, L, El-Adhami, W, Straus, SE
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins 2020
_version_ 1797087787294392320
author Tricco, AC
Lachance, CC
Rios, P
Darvesh, N
Antony, J
Radhakrishnan, A
Anand, SS
Baxter, N
Burns, KEA
Coyle, D
Curran, JA
Fiest, K
Graham, ID
Hawker, G
Légaré, F
Watt, J
Witteman, HO
Clark, JP
Bourgeault, IL
Leigh, JP
Ahmed, SB
Lawford, K
Aiken, A
Falk-Krzesinski, HJ
Langlois, EV
McCabe, C
Shepperd, S
Skidmore, B
Pattani, R
Leon, N
Lundine, J
Adisso, L
El-Adhami, W
Straus, SE
author_facet Tricco, AC
Lachance, CC
Rios, P
Darvesh, N
Antony, J
Radhakrishnan, A
Anand, SS
Baxter, N
Burns, KEA
Coyle, D
Curran, JA
Fiest, K
Graham, ID
Hawker, G
Légaré, F
Watt, J
Witteman, HO
Clark, JP
Bourgeault, IL
Leigh, JP
Ahmed, SB
Lawford, K
Aiken, A
Falk-Krzesinski, HJ
Langlois, EV
McCabe, C
Shepperd, S
Skidmore, B
Pattani, R
Leon, N
Lundine, J
Adisso, L
El-Adhami, W
Straus, SE
author_sort Tricco, AC
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Objective:</strong><br /> The objective of this review is to describe the global evidence of gender inequity among individuals with appointments at academic institutions that conduct health research, and examine how gender intersects with other social identities to influence outcomes.</p><br /> <p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br /> The gender demographics of universities have shifted, yet the characteristics of those who lead academic health research institutions have not reflected this change. Synthesized evidence will guide decision-making and policy development to support the progress of gender and other under-represented social identities in academia.</p><br /> <p><strong>Inclusion Criteria:</strong><br /> This review will consider any quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods primary research that reports outcome data related to gender equity and other social identities among individuals affiliated with academic or research institutions that conduct health research, originating from any country.</p><br /> <p><strong>Methods:</strong><br /> The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Cochrane Collaboration's guidance on living reviews will inform the review methods. Information sources will include electronic databases, unpublished literature sources, reference scanning of relevant systematic reviews, and sources provided by experts on the research team. Searches will be run regularly to monitor the development of new literature and determine when the review will be updated. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers working independently, and all discrepancies will be resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Data synthesis will summarize information using descriptive frequencies and simple thematic analysis. Results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension to scoping reviews.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:40:38Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:aa538d7f-974e-41cf-89b7-845f50dcfc58
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:40:38Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:aa538d7f-974e-41cf-89b7-845f50dcfc582022-03-27T03:14:28ZGlobal evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocolJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:aa538d7f-974e-41cf-89b7-845f50dcfc58EnglishSymplectic ElementsLippincott, Williams and Wilkins2020Tricco, ACLachance, CCRios, PDarvesh, NAntony, JRadhakrishnan, AAnand, SSBaxter, NBurns, KEACoyle, DCurran, JAFiest, KGraham, IDHawker, GLégaré, FWatt, JWitteman, HOClark, JPBourgeault, ILLeigh, JPAhmed, SBLawford, KAiken, AFalk-Krzesinski, HJLanglois, EVMcCabe, CShepperd, SSkidmore, BPattani, RLeon, NLundine, JAdisso, LEl-Adhami, WStraus, SE<p><strong>Objective:</strong><br /> The objective of this review is to describe the global evidence of gender inequity among individuals with appointments at academic institutions that conduct health research, and examine how gender intersects with other social identities to influence outcomes.</p><br /> <p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br /> The gender demographics of universities have shifted, yet the characteristics of those who lead academic health research institutions have not reflected this change. Synthesized evidence will guide decision-making and policy development to support the progress of gender and other under-represented social identities in academia.</p><br /> <p><strong>Inclusion Criteria:</strong><br /> This review will consider any quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods primary research that reports outcome data related to gender equity and other social identities among individuals affiliated with academic or research institutions that conduct health research, originating from any country.</p><br /> <p><strong>Methods:</strong><br /> The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Cochrane Collaboration's guidance on living reviews will inform the review methods. Information sources will include electronic databases, unpublished literature sources, reference scanning of relevant systematic reviews, and sources provided by experts on the research team. Searches will be run regularly to monitor the development of new literature and determine when the review will be updated. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers working independently, and all discrepancies will be resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Data synthesis will summarize information using descriptive frequencies and simple thematic analysis. Results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension to scoping reviews.</p>
spellingShingle Tricco, AC
Lachance, CC
Rios, P
Darvesh, N
Antony, J
Radhakrishnan, A
Anand, SS
Baxter, N
Burns, KEA
Coyle, D
Curran, JA
Fiest, K
Graham, ID
Hawker, G
Légaré, F
Watt, J
Witteman, HO
Clark, JP
Bourgeault, IL
Leigh, JP
Ahmed, SB
Lawford, K
Aiken, A
Falk-Krzesinski, HJ
Langlois, EV
McCabe, C
Shepperd, S
Skidmore, B
Pattani, R
Leon, N
Lundine, J
Adisso, L
El-Adhami, W
Straus, SE
Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
title Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
title_full Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
title_short Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
title_sort global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research a living scoping review protocol
work_keys_str_mv AT triccoac globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT lachancecc globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT riosp globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT darveshn globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT antonyj globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT radhakrishnana globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT anandss globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT baxtern globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT burnskea globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT coyled globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT curranja globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT fiestk globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT grahamid globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT hawkerg globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT legaref globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT wattj globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT wittemanho globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT clarkjp globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT bourgeaultil globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT leighjp globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT ahmedsb globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT lawfordk globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT aikena globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT falkkrzesinskihj globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT langloisev globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT mccabec globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT shepperds globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT skidmoreb globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT pattanir globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT leonn globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT lundinej globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT adissol globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT eladhamiw globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol
AT strausse globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol