Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
<p><strong>Objective:</strong><br /> The objective of this review is to describe the global evidence of gender inequity among individuals with appointments at academic institutions that conduct health research, and examine how gender intersects with other social identities to...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
2020
|
_version_ | 1797087787294392320 |
---|---|
author | Tricco, AC Lachance, CC Rios, P Darvesh, N Antony, J Radhakrishnan, A Anand, SS Baxter, N Burns, KEA Coyle, D Curran, JA Fiest, K Graham, ID Hawker, G Légaré, F Watt, J Witteman, HO Clark, JP Bourgeault, IL Leigh, JP Ahmed, SB Lawford, K Aiken, A Falk-Krzesinski, HJ Langlois, EV McCabe, C Shepperd, S Skidmore, B Pattani, R Leon, N Lundine, J Adisso, L El-Adhami, W Straus, SE |
author_facet | Tricco, AC Lachance, CC Rios, P Darvesh, N Antony, J Radhakrishnan, A Anand, SS Baxter, N Burns, KEA Coyle, D Curran, JA Fiest, K Graham, ID Hawker, G Légaré, F Watt, J Witteman, HO Clark, JP Bourgeault, IL Leigh, JP Ahmed, SB Lawford, K Aiken, A Falk-Krzesinski, HJ Langlois, EV McCabe, C Shepperd, S Skidmore, B Pattani, R Leon, N Lundine, J Adisso, L El-Adhami, W Straus, SE |
author_sort | Tricco, AC |
collection | OXFORD |
description | <p><strong>Objective:</strong><br />
The objective of this review is to describe the global evidence of gender inequity among individuals with appointments at academic institutions that conduct health research, and examine how gender intersects with other social identities to influence outcomes.</p><br />
<p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br />
The gender demographics of universities have shifted, yet the characteristics of those who lead academic health research institutions have not reflected this change. Synthesized evidence will guide decision-making and policy development to support the progress of gender and other under-represented social identities in academia.</p><br />
<p><strong>Inclusion Criteria:</strong><br />
This review will consider any quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods primary research that reports outcome data related to gender equity and other social identities among individuals affiliated with academic or research institutions that conduct health research, originating from any country.</p><br />
<p><strong>Methods:</strong><br />
The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Cochrane Collaboration's guidance on living reviews will inform the review methods. Information sources will include electronic databases, unpublished literature sources, reference scanning of relevant systematic reviews, and sources provided by experts on the research team. Searches will be run regularly to monitor the development of new literature and determine when the review will be updated. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers working independently, and all discrepancies will be resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Data synthesis will summarize information using descriptive frequencies and simple thematic analysis. Results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension to scoping reviews.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:40:38Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:aa538d7f-974e-41cf-89b7-845f50dcfc58 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:40:38Z |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:aa538d7f-974e-41cf-89b7-845f50dcfc582022-03-27T03:14:28ZGlobal evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocolJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:aa538d7f-974e-41cf-89b7-845f50dcfc58EnglishSymplectic ElementsLippincott, Williams and Wilkins2020Tricco, ACLachance, CCRios, PDarvesh, NAntony, JRadhakrishnan, AAnand, SSBaxter, NBurns, KEACoyle, DCurran, JAFiest, KGraham, IDHawker, GLégaré, FWatt, JWitteman, HOClark, JPBourgeault, ILLeigh, JPAhmed, SBLawford, KAiken, AFalk-Krzesinski, HJLanglois, EVMcCabe, CShepperd, SSkidmore, BPattani, RLeon, NLundine, JAdisso, LEl-Adhami, WStraus, SE<p><strong>Objective:</strong><br /> The objective of this review is to describe the global evidence of gender inequity among individuals with appointments at academic institutions that conduct health research, and examine how gender intersects with other social identities to influence outcomes.</p><br /> <p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br /> The gender demographics of universities have shifted, yet the characteristics of those who lead academic health research institutions have not reflected this change. Synthesized evidence will guide decision-making and policy development to support the progress of gender and other under-represented social identities in academia.</p><br /> <p><strong>Inclusion Criteria:</strong><br /> This review will consider any quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods primary research that reports outcome data related to gender equity and other social identities among individuals affiliated with academic or research institutions that conduct health research, originating from any country.</p><br /> <p><strong>Methods:</strong><br /> The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Cochrane Collaboration's guidance on living reviews will inform the review methods. Information sources will include electronic databases, unpublished literature sources, reference scanning of relevant systematic reviews, and sources provided by experts on the research team. Searches will be run regularly to monitor the development of new literature and determine when the review will be updated. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers working independently, and all discrepancies will be resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Data synthesis will summarize information using descriptive frequencies and simple thematic analysis. Results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension to scoping reviews.</p> |
spellingShingle | Tricco, AC Lachance, CC Rios, P Darvesh, N Antony, J Radhakrishnan, A Anand, SS Baxter, N Burns, KEA Coyle, D Curran, JA Fiest, K Graham, ID Hawker, G Légaré, F Watt, J Witteman, HO Clark, JP Bourgeault, IL Leigh, JP Ahmed, SB Lawford, K Aiken, A Falk-Krzesinski, HJ Langlois, EV McCabe, C Shepperd, S Skidmore, B Pattani, R Leon, N Lundine, J Adisso, L El-Adhami, W Straus, SE Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol |
title | Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol |
title_full | Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol |
title_short | Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol |
title_sort | global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research a living scoping review protocol |
work_keys_str_mv | AT triccoac globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT lachancecc globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT riosp globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT darveshn globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT antonyj globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT radhakrishnana globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT anandss globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT baxtern globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT burnskea globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT coyled globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT curranja globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT fiestk globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT grahamid globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT hawkerg globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT legaref globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT wattj globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT wittemanho globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT clarkjp globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT bourgeaultil globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT leighjp globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT ahmedsb globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT lawfordk globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT aikena globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT falkkrzesinskihj globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT langloisev globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT mccabec globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT shepperds globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT skidmoreb globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT pattanir globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT leonn globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT lundinej globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT adissol globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT eladhamiw globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol AT strausse globalevidenceofgenderinequityinacademichealthresearchalivingscopingreviewprotocol |