Afterword: the utopianisation of bureaucracy

Utopia, from the ancient Greek ‘ou‐topos’ (‘not a place’ or ‘nowhere’), quite literally refers to a place that is not there. Perhaps this emphasis on utopia as place is most starkly present in Thomas More’s 1516 Utopia which was an island. Bureaucracy, a combination of the French word bureau (desk o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mathur, N
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
_version_ 1797087848926543872
author Mathur, N
author_facet Mathur, N
author_sort Mathur, N
collection OXFORD
description Utopia, from the ancient Greek ‘ou‐topos’ (‘not a place’ or ‘nowhere’), quite literally refers to a place that is not there. Perhaps this emphasis on utopia as place is most starkly present in Thomas More’s 1516 Utopia which was an island. Bureaucracy, a combination of the French word bureau (desk or office) and the Greek word kratos (rule), also originated as a form of rule or political power that is embedded in place – a desk, an office. These two types of non‐places have, up until now, been kept largely separate. The Weberian disenchantedness and the ‘iron cage of modernity’ that is most commonly associated with bureaucracy are normally considered a far cry from the desirability implicit in non‐place places and states of being that are utopias. In this act of putting utopias in conversation with bureaucracy and, in fact, considering utopianisation simultaneously a process and an ideal that forms the foundation of international organisations, this collection makes a series of intellectual manoeuvres that I briefly touch on as a focus on scale (the international/national/local); bureaucratisation and utopianisation as processes rather than states‐of‐(non‐)being; methodological hooks; imaginaries of bureaucracy; and the value of comparison.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:41:28Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:aa981ef9-d15e-4bd6-8a9f-8aefa10bc7bc
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:41:28Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:aa981ef9-d15e-4bd6-8a9f-8aefa10bc7bc2022-03-27T03:16:13ZAfterword: the utopianisation of bureaucracyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:aa981ef9-d15e-4bd6-8a9f-8aefa10bc7bcEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2020Mathur, NUtopia, from the ancient Greek ‘ou‐topos’ (‘not a place’ or ‘nowhere’), quite literally refers to a place that is not there. Perhaps this emphasis on utopia as place is most starkly present in Thomas More’s 1516 Utopia which was an island. Bureaucracy, a combination of the French word bureau (desk or office) and the Greek word kratos (rule), also originated as a form of rule or political power that is embedded in place – a desk, an office. These two types of non‐places have, up until now, been kept largely separate. The Weberian disenchantedness and the ‘iron cage of modernity’ that is most commonly associated with bureaucracy are normally considered a far cry from the desirability implicit in non‐place places and states of being that are utopias. In this act of putting utopias in conversation with bureaucracy and, in fact, considering utopianisation simultaneously a process and an ideal that forms the foundation of international organisations, this collection makes a series of intellectual manoeuvres that I briefly touch on as a focus on scale (the international/national/local); bureaucratisation and utopianisation as processes rather than states‐of‐(non‐)being; methodological hooks; imaginaries of bureaucracy; and the value of comparison.
spellingShingle Mathur, N
Afterword: the utopianisation of bureaucracy
title Afterword: the utopianisation of bureaucracy
title_full Afterword: the utopianisation of bureaucracy
title_fullStr Afterword: the utopianisation of bureaucracy
title_full_unstemmed Afterword: the utopianisation of bureaucracy
title_short Afterword: the utopianisation of bureaucracy
title_sort afterword the utopianisation of bureaucracy
work_keys_str_mv AT mathurn afterwordtheutopianisationofbureaucracy