Wrongdoing by results: Moore's experiential argument
Michael Moore and I agree about the moral importance of how our actions turn out. We even agree about some of the arguments that establish that moral importance. In Causation and Responsibility, however, Moore foregrounds one argument that I do not find persuasive or even helpful. In fact I doubt wh...
Main Author: | Gardner, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2012
|
Similar Items
-
The wrongdoing that gets results
by: Gardner, J
Published: (2004) -
Chasing the Elusive Wrongdoing Intuition
by: David Wasserman
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Ordinary wrongdoing and responsibility worth wanting
by: Maureen Sie
Published: (2005-01-01) -
The place of fault in Grotius's conception of liability for wrongdoing
by: Sampson, J
Published: (2021) -
The limits of natural law: liability for wrongdoing in the Inleidinge
by: Sampson, J
Published: (2019)