Wrongdoing by results: Moore's experiential argument
Michael Moore and I agree about the moral importance of how our actions turn out. We even agree about some of the arguments that establish that moral importance. In Causation and Responsibility, however, Moore foregrounds one argument that I do not find persuasive or even helpful. In fact I doubt wh...
Auteur principal: | Gardner, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Langue: | English |
Publié: |
Cambridge University Press
2012
|
Documents similaires
-
The wrongdoing that gets results
par: Gardner, J
Publié: (2004) -
Chasing the Elusive Wrongdoing Intuition
par: David Wasserman
Publié: (2020-02-01) -
Ordinary wrongdoing and responsibility worth wanting
par: Maureen Sie
Publié: (2005-01-01) -
The place of fault in Grotius's conception of liability for wrongdoing
par: Sampson, J
Publié: (2021) -
The limits of natural law: liability for wrongdoing in the Inleidinge
par: Sampson, J
Publié: (2019)