Wrongdoing by results: Moore's experiential argument
Michael Moore and I agree about the moral importance of how our actions turn out. We even agree about some of the arguments that establish that moral importance. In Causation and Responsibility, however, Moore foregrounds one argument that I do not find persuasive or even helpful. In fact I doubt wh...
Автор: | Gardner, J |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Cambridge University Press
2012
|
Схожі ресурси
Схожі ресурси
-
The wrongdoing that gets results
за авторством: Gardner, J
Опубліковано: (2004) -
Chasing the Elusive Wrongdoing Intuition
за авторством: David Wasserman
Опубліковано: (2020-02-01) -
Ordinary wrongdoing and responsibility worth wanting
за авторством: Maureen Sie
Опубліковано: (2005-01-01) -
The place of fault in Grotius's conception of liability for wrongdoing
за авторством: Sampson, J
Опубліковано: (2021) -
The limits of natural law: liability for wrongdoing in the Inleidinge
за авторством: Sampson, J
Опубліковано: (2019)