Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES:<br>Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studie...
Váldodahkkit: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Materiálatiipa: | Journal article |
Giella: | English |
Almmustuhtton: |
Wiley
2020
|
_version_ | 1826290596335058944 |
---|---|
author | Lyubenova, A Neupane, D Levis, B Wu, Y Sun, Y He, C Krishnan, A Bhandari, PM Negeri, Z Imran, M Rice, DB Azar, M Chiovitti, MJ Saadat, N Riehm, KE Boruff, JT Ioannidis, JPA Cuijpers, P Gilbody, S Kloda, LA Patten, SB Shrier, I Ziegelstein, RC Comeau, L Mitchell, ND Tonelli, M Vigod, SN Aceti, F Barnes, J Bavle, AD Beck, CT Bindt, C Boyce, PM Bunevicius, A Chaudron, LH Favez, N Figueiredo, B Garcia-Esteve, L Giardinelli, L Helle, N Howard, LM Kohlhoff, J Kusminskas, L Kozinszky, Z Lelli, L Leonardou, AA Meuti, V Radoš, SN García, PN Pawlby, SJ Stein, A |
author_facet | Lyubenova, A Neupane, D Levis, B Wu, Y Sun, Y He, C Krishnan, A Bhandari, PM Negeri, Z Imran, M Rice, DB Azar, M Chiovitti, MJ Saadat, N Riehm, KE Boruff, JT Ioannidis, JPA Cuijpers, P Gilbody, S Kloda, LA Patten, SB Shrier, I Ziegelstein, RC Comeau, L Mitchell, ND Tonelli, M Vigod, SN Aceti, F Barnes, J Bavle, AD Beck, CT Bindt, C Boyce, PM Bunevicius, A Chaudron, LH Favez, N Figueiredo, B Garcia-Esteve, L Giardinelli, L Helle, N Howard, LM Kohlhoff, J Kusminskas, L Kozinszky, Z Lelli, L Leonardou, AA Meuti, V Radoš, SN García, PN Pawlby, SJ Stein, A |
author_sort | Lyubenova, A |
collection | OXFORD |
description | OBJECTIVES:<br>Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. <br>METHODS:<br>We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. <br>RESULTS:<br>Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (≥9 to ≥14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS ≥ 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS ≥ 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS ≥14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%). <br>CONCLUSION:<br>EPDS ≥14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:46:34Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:ac3f00f7-66a4-421e-934e-a5b43dc5a1dc |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:46:34Z |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:ac3f00f7-66a4-421e-934e-a5b43dc5a1dc2022-03-27T03:27:49ZDepression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ac3f00f7-66a4-421e-934e-a5b43dc5a1dcEnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2020Lyubenova, ANeupane, DLevis, BWu, YSun, YHe, CKrishnan, ABhandari, PMNegeri, ZImran, MRice, DBAzar, MChiovitti, MJSaadat, NRiehm, KEBoruff, JTIoannidis, JPACuijpers, PGilbody, SKloda, LAPatten, SBShrier, IZiegelstein, RCComeau, LMitchell, NDTonelli, MVigod, SNAceti, FBarnes, JBavle, ADBeck, CTBindt, CBoyce, PMBunevicius, AChaudron, LHFavez, NFigueiredo, BGarcia-Esteve, LGiardinelli, LHelle, NHoward, LMKohlhoff, JKusminskas, LKozinszky, ZLelli, LLeonardou, AAMeuti, VRadoš, SNGarcía, PNPawlby, SJStein, AOBJECTIVES:<br>Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. <br>METHODS:<br>We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. <br>RESULTS:<br>Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (≥9 to ≥14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS ≥ 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS ≥ 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS ≥14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%). <br>CONCLUSION:<br>EPDS ≥14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation. |
spellingShingle | Lyubenova, A Neupane, D Levis, B Wu, Y Sun, Y He, C Krishnan, A Bhandari, PM Negeri, Z Imran, M Rice, DB Azar, M Chiovitti, MJ Saadat, N Riehm, KE Boruff, JT Ioannidis, JPA Cuijpers, P Gilbody, S Kloda, LA Patten, SB Shrier, I Ziegelstein, RC Comeau, L Mitchell, ND Tonelli, M Vigod, SN Aceti, F Barnes, J Bavle, AD Beck, CT Bindt, C Boyce, PM Bunevicius, A Chaudron, LH Favez, N Figueiredo, B Garcia-Esteve, L Giardinelli, L Helle, N Howard, LM Kohlhoff, J Kusminskas, L Kozinszky, Z Lelli, L Leonardou, AA Meuti, V Radoš, SN García, PN Pawlby, SJ Stein, A Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis |
title | Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_full | Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_short | Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_sort | depression prevalence based on the edinburgh postnatal depression scale compared to structured clinical interview for dsm disorders classification systematic review and individual participant data meta analysis |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyubenovaa depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT neupaned depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT levisb depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT wuy depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT suny depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT hec depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT krishnana depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT bhandaripm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT negeriz depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT imranm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT ricedb depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT azarm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT chiovittimj depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT saadatn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT riehmke depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT boruffjt depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT ioannidisjpa depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT cuijpersp depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT gilbodys depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT klodala depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT pattensb depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT shrieri depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT ziegelsteinrc depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT comeaul depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT mitchellnd depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT tonellim depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT vigodsn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT acetif depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT barnesj depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT bavlead depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT beckct depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT bindtc depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT boycepm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT buneviciusa depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT chaudronlh depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT favezn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT figueiredob depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT garciaestevel depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT giardinellil depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT hellen depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT howardlm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT kohlhoffj depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT kusminskasl depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT kozinszkyz depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT lellil depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT leonardouaa depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT meutiv depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT radossn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT garciapn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT pawlbysj depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT steina depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis |