Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES:<br>Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studie...

Olles dieđut

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkkit: Lyubenova, A, Neupane, D, Levis, B, Wu, Y, Sun, Y, He, C, Krishnan, A, Bhandari, PM, Negeri, Z, Imran, M, Rice, DB, Azar, M, Chiovitti, MJ, Saadat, N, Riehm, KE, Boruff, JT, Ioannidis, JPA, Cuijpers, P, Gilbody, S, Kloda, LA, Patten, SB, Shrier, I, Ziegelstein, RC, Comeau, L, Mitchell, ND, Tonelli, M, Vigod, SN, Aceti, F, Barnes, J, Bavle, AD, Beck, CT, Bindt, C, Boyce, PM, Bunevicius, A, Chaudron, LH, Favez, N, Figueiredo, B, Garcia-Esteve, L, Giardinelli, L, Helle, N, Howard, LM, Kohlhoff, J, Kusminskas, L, Kozinszky, Z, Lelli, L, Leonardou, AA, Meuti, V, Radoš, SN, García, PN, Pawlby, SJ, Stein, A
Materiálatiipa: Journal article
Giella:English
Almmustuhtton: Wiley 2020
_version_ 1826290596335058944
author Lyubenova, A
Neupane, D
Levis, B
Wu, Y
Sun, Y
He, C
Krishnan, A
Bhandari, PM
Negeri, Z
Imran, M
Rice, DB
Azar, M
Chiovitti, MJ
Saadat, N
Riehm, KE
Boruff, JT
Ioannidis, JPA
Cuijpers, P
Gilbody, S
Kloda, LA
Patten, SB
Shrier, I
Ziegelstein, RC
Comeau, L
Mitchell, ND
Tonelli, M
Vigod, SN
Aceti, F
Barnes, J
Bavle, AD
Beck, CT
Bindt, C
Boyce, PM
Bunevicius, A
Chaudron, LH
Favez, N
Figueiredo, B
Garcia-Esteve, L
Giardinelli, L
Helle, N
Howard, LM
Kohlhoff, J
Kusminskas, L
Kozinszky, Z
Lelli, L
Leonardou, AA
Meuti, V
Radoš, SN
García, PN
Pawlby, SJ
Stein, A
author_facet Lyubenova, A
Neupane, D
Levis, B
Wu, Y
Sun, Y
He, C
Krishnan, A
Bhandari, PM
Negeri, Z
Imran, M
Rice, DB
Azar, M
Chiovitti, MJ
Saadat, N
Riehm, KE
Boruff, JT
Ioannidis, JPA
Cuijpers, P
Gilbody, S
Kloda, LA
Patten, SB
Shrier, I
Ziegelstein, RC
Comeau, L
Mitchell, ND
Tonelli, M
Vigod, SN
Aceti, F
Barnes, J
Bavle, AD
Beck, CT
Bindt, C
Boyce, PM
Bunevicius, A
Chaudron, LH
Favez, N
Figueiredo, B
Garcia-Esteve, L
Giardinelli, L
Helle, N
Howard, LM
Kohlhoff, J
Kusminskas, L
Kozinszky, Z
Lelli, L
Leonardou, AA
Meuti, V
Radoš, SN
García, PN
Pawlby, SJ
Stein, A
author_sort Lyubenova, A
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVES:<br>Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. <br>METHODS:<br>We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. <br>RESULTS:<br>Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (&#x2265;9 to &#x2265;14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS &#x2265; 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS &#x2265; 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS &#x2265;14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%). <br>CONCLUSION:<br>EPDS &#x2265;14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:46:34Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ac3f00f7-66a4-421e-934e-a5b43dc5a1dc
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:46:34Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ac3f00f7-66a4-421e-934e-a5b43dc5a1dc2022-03-27T03:27:49ZDepression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ac3f00f7-66a4-421e-934e-a5b43dc5a1dcEnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2020Lyubenova, ANeupane, DLevis, BWu, YSun, YHe, CKrishnan, ABhandari, PMNegeri, ZImran, MRice, DBAzar, MChiovitti, MJSaadat, NRiehm, KEBoruff, JTIoannidis, JPACuijpers, PGilbody, SKloda, LAPatten, SBShrier, IZiegelstein, RCComeau, LMitchell, NDTonelli, MVigod, SNAceti, FBarnes, JBavle, ADBeck, CTBindt, CBoyce, PMBunevicius, AChaudron, LHFavez, NFigueiredo, BGarcia-Esteve, LGiardinelli, LHelle, NHoward, LMKohlhoff, JKusminskas, LKozinszky, ZLelli, LLeonardou, AAMeuti, VRadoš, SNGarcía, PNPawlby, SJStein, AOBJECTIVES:<br>Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. <br>METHODS:<br>We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. <br>RESULTS:<br>Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (&#x2265;9 to &#x2265;14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS &#x2265; 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS &#x2265; 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS &#x2265;14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%). <br>CONCLUSION:<br>EPDS &#x2265;14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation.
spellingShingle Lyubenova, A
Neupane, D
Levis, B
Wu, Y
Sun, Y
He, C
Krishnan, A
Bhandari, PM
Negeri, Z
Imran, M
Rice, DB
Azar, M
Chiovitti, MJ
Saadat, N
Riehm, KE
Boruff, JT
Ioannidis, JPA
Cuijpers, P
Gilbody, S
Kloda, LA
Patten, SB
Shrier, I
Ziegelstein, RC
Comeau, L
Mitchell, ND
Tonelli, M
Vigod, SN
Aceti, F
Barnes, J
Bavle, AD
Beck, CT
Bindt, C
Boyce, PM
Bunevicius, A
Chaudron, LH
Favez, N
Figueiredo, B
Garcia-Esteve, L
Giardinelli, L
Helle, N
Howard, LM
Kohlhoff, J
Kusminskas, L
Kozinszky, Z
Lelli, L
Leonardou, AA
Meuti, V
Radoš, SN
García, PN
Pawlby, SJ
Stein, A
Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_full Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_fullStr Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_short Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_sort depression prevalence based on the edinburgh postnatal depression scale compared to structured clinical interview for dsm disorders classification systematic review and individual participant data meta analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT lyubenovaa depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT neupaned depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT levisb depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT wuy depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT suny depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT hec depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT krishnana depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT bhandaripm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT negeriz depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT imranm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT ricedb depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT azarm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT chiovittimj depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT saadatn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT riehmke depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT boruffjt depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT ioannidisjpa depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT cuijpersp depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT gilbodys depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT klodala depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT pattensb depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT shrieri depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT ziegelsteinrc depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT comeaul depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT mitchellnd depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT tonellim depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT vigodsn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT acetif depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT barnesj depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT bavlead depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT beckct depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT bindtc depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT boycepm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT buneviciusa depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT chaudronlh depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT favezn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT figueiredob depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT garciaestevel depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT giardinellil depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT hellen depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT howardlm depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT kohlhoffj depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT kusminskasl depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT kozinszkyz depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT lellil depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT leonardouaa depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT meutiv depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT radossn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT garciapn depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT pawlbysj depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT steina depressionprevalencebasedontheedinburghpostnataldepressionscalecomparedtostructuredclinicalinterviewfordsmdisordersclassificationsystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis