Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
For many users of the biomedical literature, abstracts may be the only source of information about a study. Hence, abstracts should allow readers to evaluate the objectives, key design features, and main results of the study. Several evaluations have shown deficiencies in the reporting of journal an...
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | Cohen, JF, Deeks, JJ, Hooft, L, Salameh, J-P, Korevaar, DA, Gatsonis, C, Hopewell, SL, Hunt, HA, Hyde, CJ, Leeflang, MM, Macaskill, P, McGrath, TA, Moher, D, Reitsma, JB, Rutjes, AWS, Takwoingi, Y, Tonelli, M, Whiting, P, Willis, BH, Thombs, B, Bossuyt, PM, McInnes, MDF |
---|---|
Μορφή: | Journal article |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Παρόμοια τεκμήρια
Παρόμοια τεκμήρια
-
Reporting guidelines for journal and conference abstracts
ανά: Cohen, JF, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2020) -
STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts
ανά: Cohen, J, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2017) -
PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.
ανά: Beller, E, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2013) -
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
ανά: Cohen, J, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2016) -
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
ανά: Heus, P, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2020)