Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
For many users of the biomedical literature, abstracts may be the only source of information about a study. Hence, abstracts should allow readers to evaluate the objectives, key design features, and main results of the study. Several evaluations have shown deficiencies in the reporting of journal an...
Main Authors: | Cohen, JF, Deeks, JJ, Hooft, L, Salameh, J-P, Korevaar, DA, Gatsonis, C, Hopewell, SL, Hunt, HA, Hyde, CJ, Leeflang, MM, Macaskill, P, McGrath, TA, Moher, D, Reitsma, JB, Rutjes, AWS, Takwoingi, Y, Tonelli, M, Whiting, P, Willis, BH, Thombs, B, Bossuyt, PM, McInnes, MDF |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Jezik: | English |
Izdano: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Podobne knjige/članki
-
PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts: a new addition to the toolbox for test accuracy research
od: Daniël A. Korevaar, et al.
Izdano: (2021-04-01) -
Reporting guidelines for journal and conference abstracts
od: Cohen, JF, et al.
Izdano: (2020) -
STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts
od: Cohen, J, et al.
Izdano: (2017) -
PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.
od: Beller, E, et al.
Izdano: (2013) -
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
od: Trevor A. McGrath, et al.
Izdano: (2019-07-01)