Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
For many users of the biomedical literature, abstracts may be the only source of information about a study. Hence, abstracts should allow readers to evaluate the objectives, key design features, and main results of the study. Several evaluations have shown deficiencies in the reporting of journal an...
Những tác giả chính: | Cohen, JF, Deeks, JJ, Hooft, L, Salameh, J-P, Korevaar, DA, Gatsonis, C, Hopewell, SL, Hunt, HA, Hyde, CJ, Leeflang, MM, Macaskill, P, McGrath, TA, Moher, D, Reitsma, JB, Rutjes, AWS, Takwoingi, Y, Tonelli, M, Whiting, P, Willis, BH, Thombs, B, Bossuyt, PM, McInnes, MDF |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Journal article |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Những quyển sách tương tự
-
PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts: a new addition to the toolbox for test accuracy research
Bằng: Daniël A. Korevaar, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021-04-01) -
Reporting guidelines for journal and conference abstracts
Bằng: Cohen, JF, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020) -
STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts
Bằng: Cohen, J, et al.
Được phát hành: (2017) -
PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.
Bằng: Beller, E, et al.
Được phát hành: (2013) -
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Bằng: Trevor A. McGrath, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019-07-01)