Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands

Background The clinical landscape of prostate biopsy (PB) is evolving with changes in procedures and techniques. Moreover, antibiotic resistance is increasing and influences the efficacy of pre-biopsy prophylactic regimens. Therefore, increasing antibiotic resistance may impact on clinical care, whi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tops, SCM, Koldewijn, EL, Somford, DM, Huis, AMP, Kolwijck, E, Wertheim, HFL, Hulscher, MEJL, Sedelaar, JPM
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2020
_version_ 1826290785852588032
author Tops, SCM
Koldewijn, EL
Somford, DM
Huis, AMP
Kolwijck, E
Wertheim, HFL
Hulscher, MEJL
Sedelaar, JPM
author_facet Tops, SCM
Koldewijn, EL
Somford, DM
Huis, AMP
Kolwijck, E
Wertheim, HFL
Hulscher, MEJL
Sedelaar, JPM
author_sort Tops, SCM
collection OXFORD
description Background The clinical landscape of prostate biopsy (PB) is evolving with changes in procedures and techniques. Moreover, antibiotic resistance is increasing and influences the efficacy of pre-biopsy prophylactic regimens. Therefore, increasing antibiotic resistance may impact on clinical care, which probably results in differences between hospitals. The objective of our study is to determine the (variability in) current practices of PB in the Netherlands and to gain insight into Dutch urologists’ perceptions of fluoroquinolone resistance and biopsy related infections. Methods An online questionnaire was prepared using SurveyMonkey® platform and distributed to all 420 members of the Dutch Association of Urology, who work in 81 Dutch hospitals. Information about PB techniques and periprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis was collected. Urologists’ perceptions regarding pre-biopsy antibiotic prophylaxis in an era of antibiotic resistance was assessed. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results One hundred sixty-one responses (38.3%) were analyzed representing 65 (80.3%) of all Dutch hospitals performing PB. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) was performed in 64 (98.5%) hospitals. 43.1% of the hospitals (also) used other image-guided biopsy techniques. Twenty-three different empirical prophylactic regimens were reported among the hospitals. Ciprofloxacin was most commonly prescribed (84.4%). The duration ranged from one pre-biopsy dose (59.4%) to 5 days extended prophylaxis. 25.2% of the urologists experienced ciprofloxacin resistance as a current problem in the prevention of biopsy related infections and 73.6% as a future problem. Conclusions There is a wide variation in practice patterns among Dutch urologists. TRUSPB is the most commonly used biopsy technique, but other image-guided biopsy techniques are increasingly used. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is not standardized and prolonged prophylaxis is common. The wide variation in practice patterns and lack of standardization underlines the need for evidence-based recommendations to guide urologists in choosing appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis for PB in the context of increasing antibiotic resistance.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:49:30Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ad300554-a459-4547-8215-dc5b07db0ff7
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:49:30Z
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ad300554-a459-4547-8215-dc5b07db0ff72022-03-27T03:33:57ZProstate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the NetherlandsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ad300554-a459-4547-8215-dc5b07db0ff7EnglishSymplectic ElementsBioMed Central2020Tops, SCMKoldewijn, ELSomford, DMHuis, AMPKolwijck, EWertheim, HFLHulscher, MEJLSedelaar, JPMBackground The clinical landscape of prostate biopsy (PB) is evolving with changes in procedures and techniques. Moreover, antibiotic resistance is increasing and influences the efficacy of pre-biopsy prophylactic regimens. Therefore, increasing antibiotic resistance may impact on clinical care, which probably results in differences between hospitals. The objective of our study is to determine the (variability in) current practices of PB in the Netherlands and to gain insight into Dutch urologists’ perceptions of fluoroquinolone resistance and biopsy related infections. Methods An online questionnaire was prepared using SurveyMonkey® platform and distributed to all 420 members of the Dutch Association of Urology, who work in 81 Dutch hospitals. Information about PB techniques and periprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis was collected. Urologists’ perceptions regarding pre-biopsy antibiotic prophylaxis in an era of antibiotic resistance was assessed. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results One hundred sixty-one responses (38.3%) were analyzed representing 65 (80.3%) of all Dutch hospitals performing PB. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) was performed in 64 (98.5%) hospitals. 43.1% of the hospitals (also) used other image-guided biopsy techniques. Twenty-three different empirical prophylactic regimens were reported among the hospitals. Ciprofloxacin was most commonly prescribed (84.4%). The duration ranged from one pre-biopsy dose (59.4%) to 5 days extended prophylaxis. 25.2% of the urologists experienced ciprofloxacin resistance as a current problem in the prevention of biopsy related infections and 73.6% as a future problem. Conclusions There is a wide variation in practice patterns among Dutch urologists. TRUSPB is the most commonly used biopsy technique, but other image-guided biopsy techniques are increasingly used. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is not standardized and prolonged prophylaxis is common. The wide variation in practice patterns and lack of standardization underlines the need for evidence-based recommendations to guide urologists in choosing appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis for PB in the context of increasing antibiotic resistance.
spellingShingle Tops, SCM
Koldewijn, EL
Somford, DM
Huis, AMP
Kolwijck, E
Wertheim, HFL
Hulscher, MEJL
Sedelaar, JPM
Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands
title Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands
title_full Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands
title_short Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands
title_sort prostate biopsy techniques and pre biopsy prophylactic measures variation in current practice patterns in the netherlands
work_keys_str_mv AT topsscm prostatebiopsytechniquesandprebiopsyprophylacticmeasuresvariationincurrentpracticepatternsinthenetherlands
AT koldewijnel prostatebiopsytechniquesandprebiopsyprophylacticmeasuresvariationincurrentpracticepatternsinthenetherlands
AT somforddm prostatebiopsytechniquesandprebiopsyprophylacticmeasuresvariationincurrentpracticepatternsinthenetherlands
AT huisamp prostatebiopsytechniquesandprebiopsyprophylacticmeasuresvariationincurrentpracticepatternsinthenetherlands
AT kolwijcke prostatebiopsytechniquesandprebiopsyprophylacticmeasuresvariationincurrentpracticepatternsinthenetherlands
AT wertheimhfl prostatebiopsytechniquesandprebiopsyprophylacticmeasuresvariationincurrentpracticepatternsinthenetherlands
AT hulschermejl prostatebiopsytechniquesandprebiopsyprophylacticmeasuresvariationincurrentpracticepatternsinthenetherlands
AT sedelaarjpm prostatebiopsytechniquesandprebiopsyprophylacticmeasuresvariationincurrentpracticepatternsinthenetherlands