A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency

This SpringerBrief proposes a general framework for reasoning about inconsistency in a wide variety of logics, including inconsistency resolution methods that have not yet been studied. The proposed framework allows users to specify preferences on how to resolve inconsistency when there are multiple...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martinez, M, Molinaro, C, Subrahmanian, V, Amgoud, L
Format: Book
Published: Springer 2013
_version_ 1797088532686176256
author Martinez, M
Molinaro, C
Subrahmanian, V
Amgoud, L
author_facet Martinez, M
Molinaro, C
Subrahmanian, V
Amgoud, L
author_sort Martinez, M
collection OXFORD
description This SpringerBrief proposes a general framework for reasoning about inconsistency in a wide variety of logics, including inconsistency resolution methods that have not yet been studied. The proposed framework allows users to specify preferences on how to resolve inconsistency when there are multiple ways to do so. This empowers users to resolve inconsistency in data leveraging both their detailed knowledge of the data as well as their application needs. The brief shows that the framework is well-suited to handle inconsistency in several logics, and provides algorithms to compute preferred options. Finally, the brief shows that the framework not only captures several existing works, but also supports reasoning about inconsistency in several logics for which no such methods exist today.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:51:25Z
format Book
id oxford-uuid:adcd4057-c88a-4503-9674-11a21e793b02
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:51:25Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:adcd4057-c88a-4503-9674-11a21e793b022022-03-27T03:38:20ZA General Framework for Reasoning On InconsistencyBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33uuid:adcd4057-c88a-4503-9674-11a21e793b02Department of Computer ScienceSpringer2013Martinez, MMolinaro, CSubrahmanian, VAmgoud, LThis SpringerBrief proposes a general framework for reasoning about inconsistency in a wide variety of logics, including inconsistency resolution methods that have not yet been studied. The proposed framework allows users to specify preferences on how to resolve inconsistency when there are multiple ways to do so. This empowers users to resolve inconsistency in data leveraging both their detailed knowledge of the data as well as their application needs. The brief shows that the framework is well-suited to handle inconsistency in several logics, and provides algorithms to compute preferred options. Finally, the brief shows that the framework not only captures several existing works, but also supports reasoning about inconsistency in several logics for which no such methods exist today.
spellingShingle Martinez, M
Molinaro, C
Subrahmanian, V
Amgoud, L
A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency
title A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency
title_full A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency
title_fullStr A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency
title_full_unstemmed A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency
title_short A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency
title_sort general framework for reasoning on inconsistency
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezm ageneralframeworkforreasoningoninconsistency
AT molinaroc ageneralframeworkforreasoningoninconsistency
AT subrahmanianv ageneralframeworkforreasoningoninconsistency
AT amgoudl ageneralframeworkforreasoningoninconsistency
AT martinezm generalframeworkforreasoningoninconsistency
AT molinaroc generalframeworkforreasoningoninconsistency
AT subrahmanianv generalframeworkforreasoningoninconsistency
AT amgoudl generalframeworkforreasoningoninconsistency