The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen
Since its inception, phenomenological philosophy has exerted an influence on empirical science. But what is the best way to practice, use and apply phenomenology in a non‐philosophical context? How deeply rooted in phenomenological philosophy must qualitative research be in order to qualify as pheno...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797088565017968640 |
|---|---|
| author | Zahavi, D |
| author_facet | Zahavi, D |
| author_sort | Zahavi, D |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Since its inception, phenomenological philosophy has exerted an influence on empirical science. But what is the best way to practice, use and apply phenomenology in a non‐philosophical context? How deeply rooted in phenomenological philosophy must qualitative research be in order to qualify as phenomenological? How many of the core commitments of phenomenology must it accept? In the following contribution, I will take a closer look at Max van Manen's work. I will argue that van Manen's understanding of and presentation of phenomenology is quite problematic and that his book Phenomenology of Practice rather than amounting to a clear and accessible presentation of the phenomenological method that would make it do‐able to researchers who are not themselves professional philosophers is in fact both abstruse and excessively complicated. I will then turn to nursing, and by taking that as my example, outline a better way to apply and practice phenomenology. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:51:53Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:adf68b35-bfce-447b-ab8b-ab12776b0c33 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:51:53Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:adf68b35-bfce-447b-ab8b-ab12776b0c332022-03-27T03:39:20ZThe practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van ManenJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:adf68b35-bfce-447b-ab8b-ab12776b0c33EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2019Zahavi, DSince its inception, phenomenological philosophy has exerted an influence on empirical science. But what is the best way to practice, use and apply phenomenology in a non‐philosophical context? How deeply rooted in phenomenological philosophy must qualitative research be in order to qualify as phenomenological? How many of the core commitments of phenomenology must it accept? In the following contribution, I will take a closer look at Max van Manen's work. I will argue that van Manen's understanding of and presentation of phenomenology is quite problematic and that his book Phenomenology of Practice rather than amounting to a clear and accessible presentation of the phenomenological method that would make it do‐able to researchers who are not themselves professional philosophers is in fact both abstruse and excessively complicated. I will then turn to nursing, and by taking that as my example, outline a better way to apply and practice phenomenology. |
| spellingShingle | Zahavi, D The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen |
| title | The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen |
| title_full | The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen |
| title_fullStr | The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen |
| title_full_unstemmed | The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen |
| title_short | The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen |
| title_sort | practice of phenomenology the case of max van manen |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zahavid thepracticeofphenomenologythecaseofmaxvanmanen AT zahavid practiceofphenomenologythecaseofmaxvanmanen |