Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states?
US voters shared large volumes of polarizing political news and information in the form of links to content from Russian, WikiLeaks and junk news sources. Was this low quality political information distributed evenly around the country, or concentrated in swing states and particular parts of the cou...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Report |
| Publicado: |
Computational Propaganda Project
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826290968026939392 |
|---|---|
| author | Howard, P Kollanyi, B Bradshaw, S Neudert, L |
| author_facet | Howard, P Kollanyi, B Bradshaw, S Neudert, L |
| author_sort | Howard, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | US voters shared large volumes of polarizing political news and information in the form of links to content from Russian, WikiLeaks and junk news sources. Was this low quality political information distributed evenly around the country, or concentrated in swing states and particular parts of the country? In this data memo we apply a tested dictionary of sources about political news and information being shared over Twitter over a ten day period around the 2016 Presidential Election. Using self-reported location information, we place a third of users by state and create asimple index for the distribution of polarizing content around the country. We find that (1) nationally, Twitter users got more misinformation, polarizing and conspiratorial content than professionally produced news. (2) Users in some states, however, shared more polarizing political news and information than users in other states. (3) Average levels of misinformation were higher i swing states than in uncontested states, even when weighted for the relative size of the user population in each state. We conclude with some observations about the impact of strategically disseminated polarizing information on public life. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:52:18Z |
| format | Report |
| id | oxford-uuid:ae140d10-edc6-4b96-98b5-ab3347470882 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T02:52:18Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Computational Propaganda Project |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:ae140d10-edc6-4b96-98b5-ab33474708822022-03-27T03:40:14ZSocial media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states?Reporthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fcuuid:ae140d10-edc6-4b96-98b5-ab3347470882Symplectic Elements at OxfordComputational Propaganda Project2017Howard, PKollanyi, BBradshaw, SNeudert, LUS voters shared large volumes of polarizing political news and information in the form of links to content from Russian, WikiLeaks and junk news sources. Was this low quality political information distributed evenly around the country, or concentrated in swing states and particular parts of the country? In this data memo we apply a tested dictionary of sources about political news and information being shared over Twitter over a ten day period around the 2016 Presidential Election. Using self-reported location information, we place a third of users by state and create asimple index for the distribution of polarizing content around the country. We find that (1) nationally, Twitter users got more misinformation, polarizing and conspiratorial content than professionally produced news. (2) Users in some states, however, shared more polarizing political news and information than users in other states. (3) Average levels of misinformation were higher i swing states than in uncontested states, even when weighted for the relative size of the user population in each state. We conclude with some observations about the impact of strategically disseminated polarizing information on public life. |
| spellingShingle | Howard, P Kollanyi, B Bradshaw, S Neudert, L Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states? |
| title | Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states? |
| title_full | Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states? |
| title_fullStr | Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states? |
| title_short | Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states? |
| title_sort | social media news and political information during the us election was polarizing content concentrated in swing states |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT howardp socialmedianewsandpoliticalinformationduringtheuselectionwaspolarizingcontentconcentratedinswingstates AT kollanyib socialmedianewsandpoliticalinformationduringtheuselectionwaspolarizingcontentconcentratedinswingstates AT bradshaws socialmedianewsandpoliticalinformationduringtheuselectionwaspolarizingcontentconcentratedinswingstates AT neudertl socialmedianewsandpoliticalinformationduringtheuselectionwaspolarizingcontentconcentratedinswingstates |