Between bonds and bridges: evidence from a survey on trust in groups

In every social transaction there is an element of trust. The degree to which we trust others, called generalized trust, is assumed to benefit from interaction with different social groups. In the trust literature, it is opposed by particularized trust, which represents our mutual confidence in indi...

Cijeli opis

Bibliografski detalji
Glavni autori: Braesemann, F, Stephany, F
Format: Journal article
Jezik:English
Izdano: Springer 2020
_version_ 1826290973720707072
author Braesemann, F
Stephany, F
author_facet Braesemann, F
Stephany, F
author_sort Braesemann, F
collection OXFORD
description In every social transaction there is an element of trust. The degree to which we trust others, called generalized trust, is assumed to benefit from interaction with different social groups. In the trust literature, it is opposed by particularized trust, which represents our mutual confidence in individuals close to us, for example, family members and friends. This study, based on a survey with 634 university students from Austria, questions the strict dichotomy between the two trust types. Our results advocate for a third, group determined type of trust. This additional trust dimension is measured by the number of groups individuals participate in. It changes fluently between particularized and generalized trust, depending on measures of group context, like frequency of interaction or group size. Our findings show that generalized trust increases with the number of groups one feels belonging to. People with less diverse social interaction, however, have more trust in their peers than in strangers.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T02:52:23Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ae1c0513-6b09-4e4d-b124-7e160534cb11
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T02:52:23Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ae1c0513-6b09-4e4d-b124-7e160534cb112022-03-27T03:40:23ZBetween bonds and bridges: evidence from a survey on trust in groupsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ae1c0513-6b09-4e4d-b124-7e160534cb11EnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer2020Braesemann, FStephany, FIn every social transaction there is an element of trust. The degree to which we trust others, called generalized trust, is assumed to benefit from interaction with different social groups. In the trust literature, it is opposed by particularized trust, which represents our mutual confidence in individuals close to us, for example, family members and friends. This study, based on a survey with 634 university students from Austria, questions the strict dichotomy between the two trust types. Our results advocate for a third, group determined type of trust. This additional trust dimension is measured by the number of groups individuals participate in. It changes fluently between particularized and generalized trust, depending on measures of group context, like frequency of interaction or group size. Our findings show that generalized trust increases with the number of groups one feels belonging to. People with less diverse social interaction, however, have more trust in their peers than in strangers.
spellingShingle Braesemann, F
Stephany, F
Between bonds and bridges: evidence from a survey on trust in groups
title Between bonds and bridges: evidence from a survey on trust in groups
title_full Between bonds and bridges: evidence from a survey on trust in groups
title_fullStr Between bonds and bridges: evidence from a survey on trust in groups
title_full_unstemmed Between bonds and bridges: evidence from a survey on trust in groups
title_short Between bonds and bridges: evidence from a survey on trust in groups
title_sort between bonds and bridges evidence from a survey on trust in groups
work_keys_str_mv AT braesemannf betweenbondsandbridgesevidencefromasurveyontrustingroups
AT stephanyf betweenbondsandbridgesevidencefromasurveyontrustingroups