Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic review
<p><strong>Background:</strong></p> The COVID-19 pandemic required mental health services around the world to adapt quickly to the new restrictions and regulations put in place to reduce the risk of transmission. As face-to-face contact became difficult, virtual methods were...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
| _version_ | 1797107630515159040 |
|---|---|
| author | Zangani, C Ostinelli, EG Smith, KA Hong, JSW Macdonald, O Reen, G Reid, K Vincent, C Syed Sheriff, R Harrison, PJ Hawton, K Pitman, A Bale, R Fazel, S Geddes, JR Cipriani, A |
| author_facet | Zangani, C Ostinelli, EG Smith, KA Hong, JSW Macdonald, O Reen, G Reid, K Vincent, C Syed Sheriff, R Harrison, PJ Hawton, K Pitman, A Bale, R Fazel, S Geddes, JR Cipriani, A |
| author_sort | Zangani, C |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p><strong>Background:</strong></p>
The COVID-19 pandemic required mental health services around the world to adapt quickly to the new restrictions and regulations put in place to reduce the risk of transmission. As face-to-face contact became difficult, virtual methods were implemented to continue to safely provide mental health care. However, it is unclear to what extent service provision transitioned to telemental health worldwide.
<p><strong>Objective:</strong></p>
We aimed to systematically review the global research literature on how mental health service provision adapted during the first year of the pandemic.
<p><strong>Methods:</strong></p>
We searched systematically for quantitative papers focusing on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services published until April 13, 2021, in the PubMed, Embase, medRxiv, and bioXriv electronic bibliographic databases, using the COVID-19 Open Access Project online platform. The screening process and data extraction were independently completed by at least two authors, and any disagreement was resolved by discussion with a senior member of the team. The findings were summarized narratively in the context of each country’s COVID-19 Stringency Index, which reflects the stringency of a government’s response to COVID-19 restrictions at a specific time.
<p><strong>Results:</strong></p>
Of the identified 24,339 records, 101 papers were included after the screening process. Reports on general services (n=72) showed that several countries’ face-to-face services reduced their activities at the start of the pandemic, with reductions in the total number of delivered visits and with some services forced to close. In contrast, telemental health use rapidly increased in many countries across the world at the beginning of the pandemic (n=55), with almost complete virtualization of general and specialistic care services by the end of the first year. Considering the reported COVID-19 Stringency Index values, the increased use of virtual means seems to correspond to periods when the Stringency Index values were at their highest in several countries. However, due to specific care requirements, telemental health could not be used in certain subgroups of patients, such as those on clozapine or depot treatments and those who continued to need face-to-face visits.
<p><strong>Conclusions:</strong></p>
During the pandemic, mental health services had to adapt quickly in the short term, implementing or increasing the use of telemental health services across the globe. Limited access to digital means, poor digital skills, and patients’ preferences and individual needs may have contributed to differences in implementing and accessing telemental health services during the pandemic. In the long term, a blended approach, combining in-person and virtual modalities, that takes into consideration the needs, preferences, and digital skills of patients may better support the future development of mental health services. It will be required to improve confidence with digital device use, training, and experience in all modalities for both clinicians and service users. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:18:45Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:aed0d57a-dd90-4d39-98f8-b1ecf10b0689 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:18:45Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:aed0d57a-dd90-4d39-98f8-b1ecf10b06892022-09-06T16:06:27ZImpact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic reviewJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:aed0d57a-dd90-4d39-98f8-b1ecf10b0689EnglishSymplectic ElementsJMIR Publications2022Zangani, COstinelli, EGSmith, KAHong, JSWMacdonald, OReen, GReid, KVincent, CSyed Sheriff, RHarrison, PJHawton, KPitman, ABale, RFazel, SGeddes, JRCipriani, A<p><strong>Background:</strong></p> The COVID-19 pandemic required mental health services around the world to adapt quickly to the new restrictions and regulations put in place to reduce the risk of transmission. As face-to-face contact became difficult, virtual methods were implemented to continue to safely provide mental health care. However, it is unclear to what extent service provision transitioned to telemental health worldwide. <p><strong>Objective:</strong></p> We aimed to systematically review the global research literature on how mental health service provision adapted during the first year of the pandemic. <p><strong>Methods:</strong></p> We searched systematically for quantitative papers focusing on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services published until April 13, 2021, in the PubMed, Embase, medRxiv, and bioXriv electronic bibliographic databases, using the COVID-19 Open Access Project online platform. The screening process and data extraction were independently completed by at least two authors, and any disagreement was resolved by discussion with a senior member of the team. The findings were summarized narratively in the context of each country’s COVID-19 Stringency Index, which reflects the stringency of a government’s response to COVID-19 restrictions at a specific time. <p><strong>Results:</strong></p> Of the identified 24,339 records, 101 papers were included after the screening process. Reports on general services (n=72) showed that several countries’ face-to-face services reduced their activities at the start of the pandemic, with reductions in the total number of delivered visits and with some services forced to close. In contrast, telemental health use rapidly increased in many countries across the world at the beginning of the pandemic (n=55), with almost complete virtualization of general and specialistic care services by the end of the first year. Considering the reported COVID-19 Stringency Index values, the increased use of virtual means seems to correspond to periods when the Stringency Index values were at their highest in several countries. However, due to specific care requirements, telemental health could not be used in certain subgroups of patients, such as those on clozapine or depot treatments and those who continued to need face-to-face visits. <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong></p> During the pandemic, mental health services had to adapt quickly in the short term, implementing or increasing the use of telemental health services across the globe. Limited access to digital means, poor digital skills, and patients’ preferences and individual needs may have contributed to differences in implementing and accessing telemental health services during the pandemic. In the long term, a blended approach, combining in-person and virtual modalities, that takes into consideration the needs, preferences, and digital skills of patients may better support the future development of mental health services. It will be required to improve confidence with digital device use, training, and experience in all modalities for both clinicians and service users. |
| spellingShingle | Zangani, C Ostinelli, EG Smith, KA Hong, JSW Macdonald, O Reen, G Reid, K Vincent, C Syed Sheriff, R Harrison, PJ Hawton, K Pitman, A Bale, R Fazel, S Geddes, JR Cipriani, A Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic review |
| title | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic review |
| title_full | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic review |
| title_short | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic review |
| title_sort | impact of the covid 19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health systematic review |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zanganic impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT ostinellieg impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT smithka impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT hongjsw impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT macdonaldo impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT reeng impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT reidk impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT vincentc impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT syedsheriffr impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT harrisonpj impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT hawtonk impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT pitmana impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT baler impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT fazels impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT geddesjr impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview AT cipriania impactofthecovid19pandemicontheglobaldeliveryofmentalhealthservicesandtelementalhealthsystematicreview |